BACKGROUND: Regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction systems are being developed to improve timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). System delays may diminish the mortality benefit achieved with primary PCI in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients, but the specific reasons for and clinical impact of delays in patients transferred for PCI are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, observational study of 2034 patients transferred for primary PCI at a single center as part of a regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction system from March 2003 to December 2009. Despite long-distance transfers, 30.4% of patients (n=613) were treated in ≤ 90 minutes and 65.7% (n=1324) were treated in ≤ 120 minutes. Delays occurred most frequently at the referral hospital (64.0%, n=1298), followed by the PCI center (15.7%, n=317) and transport (12.6%, n=255). For the referral hospital, the most common reasons for delay were awaiting transport (26.4%, n=535) and emergency department delays (14.3%, n=289). Diagnostic dilemmas (median, 95.5 minutes; 25th and 75th percentiles, 72-127 minutes) and nondiagnostic initial ECGs (81 minutes; 64-110.5 minutes) led to delays of the greatest magnitude. Delays caused by cardiac arrest and/or cardiogenic shock had the highest in-hospital mortality (30.6%), in contrast with nondiagnostic initial ECGs, which, despite long treatment delays, did not affect mortality (0%). Significant variation in both the magnitude and clinical impact of delays also occurred during the transport and PCI center segments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment delays occur even in efficient systems for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction care. The clinical impact of specific delays in interhospital transfer for PCI varies according to the cause of the delay.
BACKGROUND: Regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction systems are being developed to improve timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). System delays may diminish the mortality benefit achieved with primary PCI in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctionpatients, but the specific reasons for and clinical impact of delays in patients transferred for PCI are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, observational study of 2034 patients transferred for primary PCI at a single center as part of a regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction system from March 2003 to December 2009. Despite long-distance transfers, 30.4% of patients (n=613) were treated in ≤ 90 minutes and 65.7% (n=1324) were treated in ≤ 120 minutes. Delays occurred most frequently at the referral hospital (64.0%, n=1298), followed by the PCI center (15.7%, n=317) and transport (12.6%, n=255). For the referral hospital, the most common reasons for delay were awaiting transport (26.4%, n=535) and emergency department delays (14.3%, n=289). Diagnostic dilemmas (median, 95.5 minutes; 25th and 75th percentiles, 72-127 minutes) and nondiagnostic initial ECGs (81 minutes; 64-110.5 minutes) led to delays of the greatest magnitude. Delays caused by cardiac arrest and/or cardiogenic shock had the highest in-hospital mortality (30.6%), in contrast with nondiagnostic initial ECGs, which, despite long treatment delays, did not affect mortality (0%). Significant variation in both the magnitude and clinical impact of delays also occurred during the transport and PCI center segments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment delays occur even in efficient systems for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction care. The clinical impact of specific delays in interhospital transfer for PCI varies according to the cause of the delay.
Authors: Karim D Mahmoud; Youlan L Gu; Maarten W Nijsten; Ronald de Vos; Wybe Nieuwland; Felix Zijlstra; Hans L Hillege; Iwan C van der Horst; Bart Jgl de Smet Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2013-06
Authors: Joseph E Ebinger; Craig E Strauss; Ross R Garberich; Steven M Bradley; Pam Rush; Ivan J Chavez; Anil K Poulose; Brandon R Porten; Timothy D Henry Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-04
Authors: Daniel Muñoz; Mayme L Roettig; Lisa Monk; Hussein Al-Khalidi; James G Jollis; Christopher B Granger Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Michael J Ward; Sunil Kripalani; Alan B Storrow; Dandan Liu; Theodore Speroff; Michael Matheny; Eric J Thomassee; Timothy J Vogus; Daniel Munoz; Carol Scott; Joseph L Fredi; Robert S Dittus Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck Journal: Rev Hum Factors Ergon Date: 2013-09-01
Authors: Uwe Zeymer; Kurt Huber; Yuling Fu; Allan Ross; Christopher Granger; Patrick Goldstein; Frans van de Werf; Paul Armstrong Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2012-06