Literature DB >> 21930717

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation attenuates oxidative lung injury in a rabbit model of acute lung injury.

Carlos Fernando Ronchi1, Ana Lucia dos Anjos Ferreira, Fabio Joly Campos, Cilmery Suemi Kurokawa, Mario Ferreira Carpi, Marcos Aurelio de Moraes, Rossano Cesar Bonatto, Julio Defaveri, Kyung-Jin Yeum, Jose Roberto Fioretto.   

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) can induce lung oxidative stress, which plays an important role in pulmonary injury. This study compared protective conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) for oxygenation, oxidative stress, inflammatory and histopathological lung injury in a rabbit model of acute lung injury (ALI). Rabbits (n = 30) were ventilated at FiO(2) 1.0. Lung injury was induced by tracheal saline infusion (30 mL/kg, 38°C). Animals were randomly assigned to: (a) sham control (CG: tidal volume [V(T)] 6 mL/kg, positive end expiratory pressure [PEEP] 5 cmH(2)O, respiratory rate [RR] 40 ipm); (b) ALI + CMV (CMVG: V(T) 6 mL/kg, PEEP 10 cmH(2)O, RR 40 ipm); or (c) ALI + HFOV (HFG: mean airway pressure [Paw] 14 cmH(2)O, RR 10 Hz) groups. Lung oxidative stress was assessed by total antioxidant performance assay, inflammatory response by the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes/bronchoalveolar lavage fluid/lung and pulmonary histological damage was quantified by a score. Ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters were recorded every 30 min. Both ALI groups showed worse oxygenation after lung injury induction. After four hours of ventilation, HFG showed better oxygenation (partial pressure of oxygen [PaO(2)] - CG: 465.9 ± 30.5 = HFG: 399.1 ± 98.2 > CMVG: 232.7 ± 104 mmHg, P < 0.05) and inflammatory responses (CMVG: 4.27 ± 1.50 > HFG: 0.33 ± 0.20 = CG: 0.16 ± 0.15; polymorphonuclear cells/bronchoalveolar lavage fluid/lung, P < 0.05), less histopathological injury score (CMVG: 5 [1-16] > HFG: 1 [0-5] > CG: 0 [0-3]; P < 0.05), and lower lung oxidative stress than CMVG (CG: 59.4 ± 4.52 = HFG: 69.0 ± 4.99 > CMVG: 47.6 ± 2.58% protection/g protein, P < 0.05). This study showed that HFOV had an important protective role in ALI. It improved oxygenation, reduced inflammatory process and histopathological damage, and attenuated oxidative lung injury compared with protective CMV under these experimental conditions considering the study limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930717     DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2011.011085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)        ISSN: 1535-3699


  4 in total

1.  An Impedance-Based Model for the Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Function in Rabbits.

Authors:  Michael S Horsmon; Nicole M Vincelli; James T Taylor; Robert L Kristovich
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Comparison between conventional protective mechanical ventilation and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation associated with the prone position.

Authors:  José Roberto Fioretto; Susiane Oliveira Klefens; Rafaelle Fernandes Pires; Cilmery Suemi Kurokawa; Mario Ferreira Carpi; Rossano César Bonatto; Marcos Aurélio Moraes; Carlos Fernando Ronchi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017-12-07

3.  Inflammatory lung injury in rabbits: effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the prone position.

Authors:  Jose Roberto Fioretto; Rafaelle Batistella Pires; Susiane Oliveira Klefens; Cilmery Suemi Kurokawa; Mario Ferreira Carpi; Rossano César Bonatto; Marcos Aurélio Moraes; Carlos Fernando Ronchi
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 4.  The Physiological Basis of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Current Evidence in Adults and Children: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew G Miller; Herng Lee Tan; Brian J Smith; Alexandre T Rotta; Jan Hau Lee
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.