Literature DB >> 21930690

Neonatal nurse staffing and delivery of clinical care in the SSBC Newborn Network.

Thillagavathie Pillay1, Peter Nightingale, Sarah Owen, Denise Kirby, Andy Spencer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure nursing workload and timely completion of essential tasks in relation to the staffing levels recommended by the British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) in Staffordshire, Shropshire and Black Country Newborn Network.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted measuring the time taken by selected nurses to undertake the necessary tasks for babies receiving different levels of care in the Network's six constituent neonatal units. An independent observer was used. The unit and individual's workload was evaluated against BAPM standards. Delays in essential predetermined tasks were recorded. The impact on quantity of care given and on the number of delayed tasks were compared between those with the recommended workload or less and those overstretched.
RESULTS: Between October 2008 and February 2009, 89 nurses were observed caring for 244 neonates over 534 h. 54% of nursing shifts failed to meet BAPM standards. Nurses with workload greater than the BAPM-recommended levels demonstrated a 28% decrease in median time spent on clinical care per baby. 92 (17%) essential tasks were delayed >1 h or not done. Delays/omissions were more likely when BAPM standards were not met (53% vs 40%, p=0.049). In nursing observations without delays/omissions, accommodating for adequate nursing breaks and working in the same area, nurses could cater for no more than 1.2, 1.5 and 2.7 babies in intensive care, high dependency care and special care, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Understaffing leads to measurable problems including delays to essential treatment and reduced clinical care. BAPM standards are not aspirational and should be regarded as a minimum. Further research on optimising nursing care efficiency with limited nursing resources is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930690     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2011.300224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  6 in total

1.  Missed oral feeding opportunities and preterm infants' time to achieve full oral feedings and neonatal intensive care unit discharge.

Authors:  Heather L Tubbs-Cooley; Rita H Pickler; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Association of Nurse Workload With Missed Nursing Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Heather L Tubbs-Cooley; Constance A Mara; Adam C Carle; Barbara A Mark; Rita H Pickler
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Nurse staffing and NICU infection rates.

Authors:  Jeannette A Rogowski; Douglas Staiger; Thelma Patrick; Jeffrey Horbar; Michael Kenny; Eileen T Lake
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Perinatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies in relation to place of birth in England: the EPICure 2 study.

Authors:  N Marlow; C Bennett; E S Draper; E M Hennessy; A S Morgan; K L Costeloe
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Admissions and mortality over a 5-year period in a limited-resource neonatal unit in Ghana.

Authors:  Adziri H Sackey; Lily G Tagoe
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2019-06

Review 6.  Expectations for nursing care in newborn units in Kenya: moving from implicit to explicit standards.

Authors:  Georgina A V Murphy; Gregory B Omondi; David Gathara; Nancy Abuya; Jacintah Mwachiro; Rose Kuria; Edna Tallam-Kimaiyo; Mike English
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-03-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.