Literature DB >> 21930501

SigReannot-mart: a query environment for expression microarray probe re-annotations.

François Moreews1, Gaelle Rauffet, Patrice Dehais, Christophe Klopp.   

Abstract

Expression microarrays are commonly used to study transcriptomes. Most of the arrays are now based on oligo-nucleotide probes. Probe design being a tedious task, it often takes place once at the beginning of the project. The oligo set is then used for several years. During this time period, the knowledge gathered by the community on the genome and the transcriptome increases and gets more precise. Therefore re-annotating the set is essential to supply the biologists with up-to-date annotations. SigReannot-mart is a query environment populated with regularly updated annotations for different oligo sets. It stores the results of the SigReannot pipeline that has mainly been used on farm and aquaculture species. It permits easy extraction in different formats using filters. It is used to compare probe sets on different criteria, to choose the set for a given experiment to mix probe sets in order to create a new one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930501      PMCID: PMC3263592          DOI: 10.1093/database/bar025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Database (Oxford)        ISSN: 1758-0463            Impact factor:   3.451


Project description

Updating annotations

The main step of the microarray creation process is the probe design. The design tools aim at maximizing the probe sequence specificity while conserving the largest possible covered transcript or gene set. The genome and transcriptome sequences used as references during the design evolve with each new assembly or new gene build, modifying the link between the probes and the corresponding biological entities. As nearly, all the annotations related to a probe are based on this link, the annotation interpretation could become hazardous just a few months after the design, especially for organisms with an unfinished genome or a partially known transcriptome, like many farm animal and aquaculture species. Consequently, researchers will need updated annotations based on the best possible probe-transcript link. This is the first goal of the SigReannot-mart database.

Re-assessing probe specificity

A specificity indicator is produced by the pipeline (1) and stored for each probe, this criteria can be used to evaluate the specificity of a probe and its chance of multiple transcripts crosshybridization. It is based on the number and the similarity scores of the blastn (2) alignments between a probe and a transcript or a genomic location. Like in OligoRAP (3) and IMAD (4) pipelines, probes are assigned to different Target Specificity Classes (Table 1), based on the amount and type of hits (5).
Table 1.

Probe target specificity classes (TSCs) and subclasses

TSCsDescription
1One good hit and no noise
2One good hit with noise
3No hit, one noise ≥30 bp
4No hit, one noise ≥20 and <30 bp
5No hit many noises
6No good hit no noises
7Many good hits
7.1 (subclasses)Many good hits but one entity
MH (subclasses)Multiple hits on one chromosome
MC (subclasses)Hits on multiple chromosomes

These quality indicators use a Blastn similarity search on the transcriptome of the studied species. As an illustration, the users can decide to reject the probes with many hits (Category 7) or not, using a complementary fine grain subcategory indicator (7.1, MH, MC). Ensembl provides probe set mapping but do not provides TSCs and stores only probes with one genomic hit and no more than one mismatch.

Probe target specificity classes (TSCs) and subclasses These quality indicators use a Blastn similarity search on the transcriptome of the studied species. As an illustration, the users can decide to reject the probes with many hits (Category 7) or not, using a complementary fine grain subcategory indicator (7.1, MH, MC). Ensembl provides probe set mapping but do not provides TSCs and stores only probes with one genomic hit and no more than one mismatch. The user can decide the level of probe specificity he wants to focus his analysis on. The specificity indicator is of high interest for biologists when they start interpreting their list of over- and under expressed genes. For the annotation of unspecific probes, only a more thorough analysis will help to understand which of the biological entities is the source of the signal. This is why SigReannot-mart provides complementary specificity subcategories that use hit location and description (Table 1).

Providing rich annotation using multiple data sources

Usually microarray manufacturers provide annotation files for their oligo sets. But they do not up-date these files with each new version of the genome annotation produced by Ensembl or the NCBI. These annotation files often contain limited information such as gene name, genomic location and some Gene Ontology (GO) terms. To help scientists interpret microarray expression data, sigReannot-mart integrates multiple complementary data sources covering external references, orthologs genes and pathways. External reference and orthologous genes are of high interest for the extraction of pathway information from sources such as David (6) or IPA (7).

Comparing array designs

When a biologist needs to choose between different available array designs, a common comparison criterion is the transcriptome coverage of the probe set (8,9). It can be evaluated by extracting the lists of pathways, GO terms, transcripts and gene IDs related to each set. But such a task tends to be tedious when the oligo sets are not annotated using the same methods and data sources. By giving access to shared standardized microarray annotations, sigReannot-mart addresses this need.

Designing new oligo sets from existing ones

Thanks to new printing techniques, it has been quite common for a number of years to build custom gene expression microarrays, even for a single scientist or a research team. The design step being a harsh time-consuming task, the strategy to build these custom microarrays is often to select probes from different existing platforms. This strategy also permits to verify the expression range of each oligo-nucleotide in the available data sets. SigReannot-mart can be used to simplify this task: the probes coming from different sets, sharing the same annotation process, can easily be selected, merged and compared to all the predicted transcripts of a studied species in order to generate the new set, with better transcriptome or specific metabolic pathway coverage.

Evolution of the annotation between Ensembl and RefSeq versions

The database contains the annotation of a probe set for different versions of Ensembl and RefSeq, which have proved to be both complementary and helpful for the interpretation of microarray gene expression data (10).

Data content of SigReannot-mart

Probes are central in the mart table structure. A probe can be linked to different probe sets (Table 2). Using alignment results, each probe will be provided with an Ensembl-gene link specificity mark which can evolve with new genome assemblies or annotations. Through the Ensembl API, based in the gene link, we fetch the orthologous genes for several species always including human and mouse as well as GO and crossreference gene identifiers.
Table 2.

Summary of data currently available in the SigReannot-mart database

MicroarraySpeciesManufacturerData set
Ensembl 56Ensembl 59 + RefSeq RNAEnsembl 61+ RefSeq RNA
44 KBovineAgilent***
24 KEADGENE*
22 KINRA*
44 kChickenAgilent***
20 KEADGENE**
44 KHorseAgilent***
GPL2881MouseAgilent*
GPL2877RatAgilent*
44 KPigAgilent***
25 KEADGENE*
17 KINRA*
44 KRabbitAgilent***
44 KSalmonAgilent*
15 KSheepAgilent***
37 KTroutAgilent**
GPL884HumanAgilent*

The frequency of update of the probe set annotation follows the Ensembl update, at least two times a year. The current probe sets are not available in Ensembl.

Asterisks correspond to the annotation version of the probe sets.

Summary of data currently available in the SigReannot-mart database The frequency of update of the probe set annotation follows the Ensembl update, at least two times a year. The current probe sets are not available in Ensembl. Asterisks correspond to the annotation version of the probe sets. Then, using orthologous HGNC identifiers and the KEGG files, we extract KEGG orthologs (KO) and pathways related to the probe. GO diagram or enrichment analysis can easily be performed using the text ouput formats. The HTML output format links the identifiers with the corresponding web pages (Table 3) from the KEGG, Ensembl, HGNC or Amigo web sites.
Table 3.

External databases referenced from SigReannot-mart

Data sourceGenesTranscriptsPathwaysGO termsGene symbolsOrthologsURLEntities description
Ensembl***www.ensembl.orgGene, ncRNA, mRNA, putative RNA and orthologuous genes
RefSeq*http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih .gov/RefSeq/Transcript
Gene Ontology*http://www.geneontology .org/GO term
HGNC*http://www.genenames .org/Gene symbol
KEGG**http://www.genome.jp/kegg/Enzyme, pathways and ortholog groups

Asterisks represent the data sources corresponding to each biological entities imported in SigReannot-mart to perform the annotation process.

External databases referenced from SigReannot-mart Asterisks represent the data sources corresponding to each biological entities imported in SigReannot-mart to perform the annotation process.

Customized BioMart environment

SigReannot-mart implements BioMart (11) version 0.7. For users unfamiliar with the BioMart query interface (Figure 1), pre-formatted annotations files are directly downloadable from the repository web page. For a quick overview of each data set annotation update, a summary and statistical report is also provided.
Figure 1.

Annotation pipeline, BioMart integration and SigReannot-mart query interface. The management of the probe annotation processing pipeline and the biomart environment are centralized and automatized to allows efficient biomart configuration for multiple data sets with limited human intervention. The BioMart database is directly created and populated at the end of the annotation pipeline (A), then the BioMart configuration is automatically generated (B) using an XML file created from a generic template (C) and probe set properties (D). The SigReannot-mart data set can be filtered by user queries from a web page (E). Many attributes can be used as filters like probe specificity, Gene hits, chromosome hit location or orthologs.

Annotation pipeline, BioMart integration and SigReannot-mart query interface. The management of the probe annotation processing pipeline and the biomart environment are centralized and automatized to allows efficient biomart configuration for multiple data sets with limited human intervention. The BioMart database is directly created and populated at the end of the annotation pipeline (A), then the BioMart configuration is automatically generated (B) using an XML file created from a generic template (C) and probe set properties (D). The SigReannot-mart data set can be filtered by user queries from a web page (E). Many attributes can be used as filters like probe specificity, Gene hits, chromosome hit location or orthologs. A new data extraction format, the data matrix type, has been added to the BioMart Attribute page, permitting to analyze the diversity of gene categories such as KEGG pathways. This format generates a Boolean matrix indicating the membership of the probes versus pathways. This type of matrices is commonly used in R/Bioconductor (12).

Query examples

To illustrate the functions of sigReannot-mart, we present here two case studies. Case 1: probe specificity study A biologist wants to check if a given probe set contains probes for a list of genes he wants to monitor and how specific these probes are. For this, he uses three criteria: the probe set name the gene names the specificity (Table 1) Step 1: select the Ensembl version in the database drop-down list. Step 2: select the probe set in the datasets drop-down list. Step 3: filter the probes using the IDs of the genes of interest. Step 4: filter the probes using the specificity category 1 and 2 of the genes of interest. BioMart query summary: Analyzing the number of records representing probes for the given gene list, the biologist can decide whether or not to use this probe set. Case 2: custom microarray design A biologist wants to create a new probe set using existing probes and probes designed for Ensembl transcripts having no probes in the existing sets. Step 1: Select all chicken transcript using the Ensembl BioMart. Step 2: Select all chicken transcripts referenced by probes. BioMart query summary: All Ensembl transcripts found in the first query and not in the second one are not related to any probes and represent valuable target sequence to design new probes for a custom probe set design.

Discussion and future directions

While SigReannot-mart is mainly used for gene expression microarray probe set quality re-assessment and re-annotation (13), it can also be used to facilitate parts of the probe design process. Gene expression microarrays are still widely used and therefore it is important to go on with the re-annotation process. New probe designs are still coming out and probe selection is currently going on: making these tasks easier contributes to the effort of offering accurate tools to monitor gene expression. Today, the SigReannot-mart data processing is industrialized enough for us to think about a user’s interface permitting to add a new probe set by uploading a FASTA file and indicating the corresponding species. The users would be able, a few hours later, to query the resulting annotations. Alternatively, the FASTA files of public probe sets received by email can already be processed, even if the related animal species are not currently supported (Table 4). Another even simpler option would be to schedule the annotation updates for existing probe sets. These two features should be made available in the near future.
Table 4.

Species related to SigReannot-mart present data sets

SpeciesCategory
CowFarm
Chicken
Horse
Pig
Rabbit
Sheep
SalmonFishery
Trout
MouseModel
Rat
Human
Species related to SigReannot-mart present data sets

Funding

EC-funded Network of Excellence EADGENE. Funding for open access charge: INRA. Conflict of interest. None declared.
DatabaseSigenae oligo annotation
Datasetbtaurus_agilent_44k (bos_taurus)
FiltersProbe : [ID-list specified], Category: 1, 2
AttributesProbe name, gene name, specificity category
DatabaseEnsembl Gene at ensembl.org
Data setGallus gallus genes (WASHUC2)
Filters
AttributesEnsembl Transcript ID
DatabaseSigenae oligo annotation at SigReannot-mart.toulouse.inra.fr
Datasetsggallus_agilent_44k(sus_scrofa) and ggallus_ eadgene_20k (sus_scrofa)
FiltersEnsembl transcript ID ([ID-list specified)
AttributesEnsembl Transcript ID
  11 in total

1.  DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery.

Authors:  Glynn Dennis; Brad T Sherman; Douglas A Hosack; Jun Yang; Wei Gao; H Clifford Lane; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  Design, validation and annotation of transcriptome-wide oligonucleotide probes for the oligochaete annelid Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Mehdi Pirooznia; Xin Guan; Edward J Perkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  An open-access long oligonucleotide microarray resource for analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes.

Authors:  Kévin Le Brigand; Roslin Russell; Chimène Moreilhon; Jean-Marie Rouillard; Bernard Jost; Franck Amiot; Virginie Magnone; Christine Bole-Feysot; Philippe Rostagno; Virginie Virolle; Virginie Defamie; Philippe Dessen; Gary Williams; Paul Lyons; Géraldine Rios; Bernard Mari; Erdogan Gulari; Philippe Kastner; Xavier Gidrol; Tom C Freeman; Pascal Barbry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  OligoRAP - an Oligo Re-Annotation Pipeline to improve annotation and estimate target specificity.

Authors:  Pieter B T Neerincx; Han Rauwerda; Haisheng Nie; Martien A M Groenen; Timo M Breit; Jack A M Leunissen
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-07-16

5.  BioMart Central Portal--unified access to biological data.

Authors:  Syed Haider; Benoit Ballester; Damian Smedley; Junjun Zhang; Peter Rice; Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Using transcriptome profiling to characterize QTL regions on chicken chromosome 5.

Authors:  Guillaume Le Mignon; Colette Désert; Frédérique Pitel; Sophie Leroux; Olivier Demeure; Gregory Guernec; Behnam Abasht; Madeleine Douaire; Pascale Le Roy; Sandrine Lagarrigue
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  IMAD: flexible annotation of microarray sequences.

Authors:  Dennis Prickett; Michael Watson
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-07-16

8.  Integrating multiple genome annotation databases improves the interpretation of microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Sarah McLoughlin; Ian B Jeffery; Antonino Glaviano; Breandan Kennedy; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  sigReannot: an oligo-set re-annotation pipeline based on similarities with the Ensembl transcripts and Unigene clusters.

Authors:  Pierrot Casel; François Moreews; Sandrine Lagarrigue; Christophe Klopp
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-07-16

10.  Comparison of three microarray probe annotation pipelines: differences in strategies and their effect on downstream analysis.

Authors:  Pieter Bt Neerincx; Pierrot Casel; Dennis Prickett; Haisheng Nie; Michael Watson; Christophe Klopp; Jack Am Leunissen; Martien Am Groenen
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-07-16
View more
  4 in total

1.  BioMart: a data federation framework for large collaborative projects.

Authors:  Junjun Zhang; Syed Haider; Joachim Baran; Anthony Cros; Jonathan M Guberman; Jack Hsu; Yong Liang; Long Yao; Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  BioMart: driving a paradigm change in biological data management.

Authors:  Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  BioMart Central Portal: an open database network for the biological community.

Authors:  Jonathan M Guberman; J Ai; O Arnaiz; Joachim Baran; Andrew Blake; Richard Baldock; Claude Chelala; David Croft; Anthony Cros; Rosalind J Cutts; A Di Génova; Simon Forbes; T Fujisawa; E Gadaleta; D M Goodstein; Gunes Gundem; Bernard Haggarty; Syed Haider; Matthew Hall; Todd Harris; Robin Haw; S Hu; Simon Hubbard; Jack Hsu; Vivek Iyer; Philip Jones; Toshiaki Katayama; R Kinsella; Lei Kong; Daniel Lawson; Yong Liang; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; J Luo; Michael Lush; Jeremy Mason; Francois Moreews; Nelson Ndegwa; Darren Oakley; Christian Perez-Llamas; Michael Primig; Elena Rivkin; S Rosanoff; Rebecca Shepherd; Reinhard Simon; B Skarnes; Damian Smedley; Linda Sperling; William Spooner; Peter Stevenson; Kevin Stone; J Teague; Jun Wang; Jianxin Wang; Brett Whitty; D T Wong; Marie Wong-Erasmus; L Yao; Ken Youens-Clark; Christina Yung; Junjun Zhang; Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  The BioMart community portal: an innovative alternative to large, centralized data repositories.

Authors:  Damian Smedley; Syed Haider; Steffen Durinck; Luca Pandini; Paolo Provero; James Allen; Olivier Arnaiz; Mohammad Hamza Awedh; Richard Baldock; Giulia Barbiera; Philippe Bardou; Tim Beck; Andrew Blake; Merideth Bonierbale; Anthony J Brookes; Gabriele Bucci; Iwan Buetti; Sarah Burge; Cédric Cabau; Joseph W Carlson; Claude Chelala; Charalambos Chrysostomou; Davide Cittaro; Olivier Collin; Raul Cordova; Rosalind J Cutts; Erik Dassi; Alex Di Genova; Anis Djari; Anthony Esposito; Heather Estrella; Eduardo Eyras; Julio Fernandez-Banet; Simon Forbes; Robert C Free; Takatomo Fujisawa; Emanuela Gadaleta; Jose M Garcia-Manteiga; David Goodstein; Kristian Gray; José Afonso Guerra-Assunção; Bernard Haggarty; Dong-Jin Han; Byung Woo Han; Todd Harris; Jayson Harshbarger; Robert K Hastings; Richard D Hayes; Claire Hoede; Shen Hu; Zhi-Liang Hu; Lucie Hutchins; Zhengyan Kan; Hideya Kawaji; Aminah Keliet; Arnaud Kerhornou; Sunghoon Kim; Rhoda Kinsella; Christophe Klopp; Lei Kong; Daniel Lawson; Dejan Lazarevic; Ji-Hyun Lee; Thomas Letellier; Chuan-Yun Li; Pietro Lio; Chu-Jun Liu; Jie Luo; Alejandro Maass; Jerome Mariette; Thomas Maurel; Stefania Merella; Azza Mostafa Mohamed; Francois Moreews; Ibounyamine Nabihoudine; Nelson Ndegwa; Céline Noirot; Cristian Perez-Llamas; Michael Primig; Alessandro Quattrone; Hadi Quesneville; Davide Rambaldi; James Reecy; Michela Riba; Steven Rosanoff; Amna Ali Saddiq; Elisa Salas; Olivier Sallou; Rebecca Shepherd; Reinhard Simon; Linda Sperling; William Spooner; Daniel M Staines; Delphine Steinbach; Kevin Stone; Elia Stupka; Jon W Teague; Abu Z Dayem Ullah; Jun Wang; Doreen Ware; Marie Wong-Erasmus; Ken Youens-Clark; Amonida Zadissa; Shi-Jian Zhang; Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.