| Literature DB >> 21929750 |
Fumimasa Nomura1, Tomoyuki Kaneko, Akihiro Hattori, Kenji Yasuda.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Conventional in vitro approach using human ether-a-go-go related gene (hERG) assay has been considered worldwide as the first screening assay for cardiac repolarization safety. However, it does not always oredict the potential QT prolongation risk or pro-arrhythmic risk correctly. For adaptable preclinical strategiesto evaluate global cardiac safety, an on-chip quasi-in vivo cardiac toxicity assay for lethal arrhythmia (ventricular tachyarrhythmia) measurement using ring-shaped closed circuit microelectrode chip has been developed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21929750 PMCID: PMC3224544 DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-39
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Figure 1On-chip quasi-in vivo cardiac toxicity measurement assay fabrication. (a) Relationship of field potential profile (FP) of single cardiomyocyte (A), quasi -in vivo ECG signals convoluted from FP profiles of lined-up cardiomyocyte network (B), and the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) of individuals (C). (b) System set-up. (c) Fabrication procedure of closed circuit-shaped lined-up cardiomyocyte network. (d) Crossectional view of loop electrode chip. (e) Phase-contrast image of the ring-shaped closed circuit electrodes. Bar, 1 mm.
Figure 2Abnormal beating and fibrillation caused by arrhythmia compound (Astemizole) in a circuit-type . (a) Procedure of compound application. (b) time course FP (quasi-in vivo ECG of ST interval) profiles after addition of 1 μM Astemizole, (c) Astemizole concentration dependence of FP waveform change. (d)-(f) Astemizole concentration dependence of FP waveform change in beating frequency (d), ST (e), and short-term variability (STV) of ST (f) in three different ring shape electrodes of 1 mm in diameter. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: P < 0.005, compareed to control in paired t-test.
Parameter of field potential recordings of cardiomyocytes circuit on ring-type electrodes at the administration of Astemizole
| Sample | Beating frequency | ST | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (Hz) | Mean ± SD (ms) | STV (ms) | |||||||||||
| Before | 10 nM | 100 nM | Before | 10 nM | 100 nM | Before | 10 nM | 100 nM | |||||
| 1 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.09 | a | 408 ± 10 | 427 ± 9 | 509 ± 23 | 446 ± 12 | 7.8 | 6.1 | 4.6 | 9.2 |
| 2 | 0.5 ± 0.05 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.26 | a | 403 ± 5 | 425 ± 7 | 481 ± 12 | 473 ± 49 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 16.9 |
| 3 | 0.63 ± 0.09 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.47 ± 0.13 | a | 364 ± 6 | 386 ± 5 | 420 ± 7 | 441 ± 27 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 7.7 |
| 4 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | a | 445 ± 9 | 491 ± 14 | 580 ± 27 | 423 ± 26 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 21.7 |
| 5 | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.38 ± 0.1 | 0.36 ± 0.06 | 0.28 ± 0.12 | b | 311 ± 6 | 337 ± 4 | 356 ± 4 | 410 ± 36 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 5.9 |
| 6 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.58 ± 0.22 | a | 425 ± 7 | 455 ± 10 | 497 ± 7 | 526 ± 19 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 11.0 |
| 7 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.09 | a | 371 ± 8 | 402 ± 6 | 428 ± 4 | 435 ± 54 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 17.1 |
| Mean | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 390 | 418 | 467 | 451 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 12.8 | |
| SD | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 45 | 49 | 73 | 38 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 5.8 | |
| t-tset | *** | * | *** | *** | ** | ** | |||||||
a: Fibrillation after abnormal beating, b: Abnormal beating, †: Calculation from FP recordings just before abnormal beating.
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: P < 0.005, compareed to control in paired t-test.