Literature DB >> 21929499

When informed consent goes poorly: a descriptive study of medical negligence claims and patient complaints.

Andrew J Gogos1, Richard B Clark, Marie M Bismark, Russell L Gruen, David M Studdert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of medicolegal disputes over informed consent. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective review and analysis of negligence claims against doctors insured by Avant Mutual Group Limited and complaints lodged with the Office of the Health Services Commissioner of Victoria that alleged failures in the informed consent process and were adjudicated between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Case frequency (by medical specialty), type of allegation, type of treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 481 cases alleged deficiencies in the informed consent process (218 of 1898 conciliated complaints [11.5%]; 263 of 7846 negligence claims [3.4%]). 57% of these cases were against surgeons. Plastic surgeons experienced dispute rates that were more than twice those of any other specialty or subspecialty group. 92% of cases (442/481) involved surgical procedures and 16% (77/481) involved cosmetic procedures. The primary allegation in 71% of cases was that the clinician failed to mention or properly explain risks of complications. Five treatment types - procedures on reproductive organs (12% of cases), procedures on facial features excluding eyes (12%), prescription medications (8%), eye surgery (7%) and breast surgery (7%) - accounted for 46% of all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The typical dispute over informed consent involves an operation, often cosmetic, and allegations that a particular complication was not properly disclosed. With Australian courts now looking to patient preferences in setting legal standards of care for risk disclosure, medicolegal disputes provide valuable insights for targeting both quality improvement efforts and risk management activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21929499     DOI: 10.5694/mja11.10379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  11 in total

1.  Leave to intervene in cases of gender identity disorder; normative causation; financial harms and involuntary treatment; and the right to be protected from suicide.

Authors:  Cameron Stewart; Tina Cockburn; Bill Madden; Sascha Callaghan; Christopher James Ryan
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  A randomized controlled trial comparing video-assisted informed consent with standard consent for Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Yueyue Miao; Victoria L Venning; Kylie-Ann Mallitt; Julia E J Rhodes; Noah J Isserman; Gilberto Moreno; Simon Lee; William Ryman; Gayle Fischer; Rebecca B Saunderson
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2020-05-11

3.  Characterising patient complaints in out-of-hours general practice: a retrospective cohort study in Ireland.

Authors:  Emma Wallace; Sinead Cronin; Norah Murphy; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Kate MacSweeney; Mel Bates; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Multilevel governance framework on grievance redressal for patient rights violations in India.

Authors:  Meena Putturaj; Sara Van Belle; Nora Engel; Bart Criel; Anja Krumeich; Prakash B Nagendrappa; Prashanth N Srinivas
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 5.  Legal disputes over duties to disclose treatment risks to patients: a review of negligence claims and complaints in Australia.

Authors:  Marie M Bismark; Andrew J Gogos; Richard B Clark; Russell L Gruen; Atul A Gawande; David M Studdert
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Ethical issues of informed consent in malaria research proposals submitted to a research ethics committee in Thailand: a retrospective document review.

Authors:  Pornpimon Adams; Sukanya Prakobtham; Chanthima Limpattaracharoen; Sumeth Suebtrakul; Pitchapa Vutikes; Srisin Khusmith; Polrat Wilairatana; Paul Adams; Jaranit Kaewkungwal
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Tailored and integrated Web-based tools for improving psychosocial outcomes of cancer patients: the DoTTI development framework.

Authors:  Rochelle Smits; Jamie Bryant; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Flora Tzelepis; Frans Henskens; Christine Paul; William Stevenson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy.

Authors:  Tom W Reader; Alex Gillespie; Jane Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Optimizing Patient Preparation and Surgical Experience Using eHealth Technology.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Kristy Forshaw; Mariko Carey; Sancha Robinson; Ross Kerridge; Anthony Proietto; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-09-01

10.  Sources of information used by patients prior to elective surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Alvin Atlas; Steve Milanese; Karen Grimmer; Sarah Barras; Jacqueline H Stephens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.