Literature DB >> 21929381

A current global view of environmental and occupational cancers.

Mihi Yang1.   

Abstract

This review is focused on current information of avoidable environmental pollution and occupational exposure as causes of cancer. Approximately 2% to 8% of all cancers are thought to be due to occupation. In addition, occupational and environmental cancers have their own characteristics, e.g., specific chemicals and cancers, multiple factors, multiple causation and interaction, or latency period. Concerning carcinogens, asbestos/silica/wood dust, soot/polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [benzo(a) pyrene], heavy metals (arsenic, chromium, nickel), aromatic amines (4-aminobiphenyl, benzidine), organic solvents (benzene or vinyl chloride), radiation/radon, or indoor pollutants (formaldehyde, tobacco smoking) are mentioned with their specific cancers, e.g., lung, skin, and bladder cancers, mesothelioma or leukemia, and exposure routes, rubber or pigment manufacturing, textile, painting, insulation, mining, and so on. In addition, nanoparticles, electromagnetic waves, and climate changes are suspected as future carcinogenic sources. Moreover, the aspects of environmental and occupational cancers are quite different between developing and developed countries. The recent follow-up of occupational cancers in Nordic countries shows a good example for developed countries. On the other hand, newly industrializing countries face an increased burden of occupational and environmental cancers. Developing countries are particularly suffering from preventable cancers in mining, agriculture, or industries without proper implication of safety regulations. Therefore, industrialized countries are expected to educate and provide support for developing countries. In addition, citizens can encounter new environmental and occupational carcinogen nominators such as nanomaterials, electromagnetic wave, and climate exchanges. As their carcinogenicity or involvement in carcinogenesis is not clearly unknown, proper consideration for them should be taken into account. For these purposes, new technologies with a balance of environment and gene are required. Currently, various approaches with advanced technologies--genomics, exposomics, etc.--have accelerated development of new biomarkers for biological monitoring of occupational and environmental carcinogens. These advanced approaches are promising to improve quality of life and to prevent occupational and environmental cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21929381     DOI: 10.1080/10590501.2011.601848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev        ISSN: 1059-0501            Impact factor:   3.781


  26 in total

1.  Particulate matters collected from ceramic factories in Lampang Province affecting rat lungs.

Authors:  Duriya Fongmoon; Surathat Pongnikorn; Aphiruk Chaisena; Sitthichai Iamsaard
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Prognostication of Survival Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed with Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Damir Nizamutdinov; Eileen M Stock; Jad A Dandashi; Eliana A Vasquez; Ying Mao; Samantha Dayawansa; Jun Zhang; Erxi Wu; Ekokobe Fonkem; Jason H Huang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Increased cytogenetic abnormalities in exfoliated oral mucosal cells of South Indian foundry workers.

Authors:  Saranya Ramalingam Singaravelu; Sudha Sellappa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Significance of exploiting non-living biomaterials for the biosorption of wastewater pollutants.

Authors:  S Rangabhashiyam; E Suganya; N Selvaraju; Lity Alen Varghese
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Cancer Stem-Like Cells Accumulated in Nickel-Induced Malignant Transformation.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jia Fan; John Andrew Hitron; Young-Ok Son; James T F Wise; Ram Vinod Roy; Donghern Kim; Jin Dai; Poyil Pratheeshkumar; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Toxic effects of formaldehyde on the urinary system.

Authors:  Mehmet İnci; İsmail Zararsız; Mürsel Davarcı; Sadık Görür
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03

7.  Progress and prospects of reactive oxygen species in metal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Lei Wang; James T F Wise; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2016-04-16

8.  Hawk-Seq™ differentiates between various mutations in Salmonella typhimurium TA100 strain caused by exposure to Ames test-positive mutagens.

Authors:  Yuki Otsubo; Shoji Matsumura; Naohiro Ikeda; Osamu Morita
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  The role of autophagy in metal-induced urogenital carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Uttara Saran; Ashish Tyagi; Balaji Chandrasekaran; Murali K Ankem; Chendil Damodaran
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 15.707

10.  Bladder cancer: a simple model becomes complex.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Caterina Gulia; Cristiano Cristini; Giorgio Fraietta; Lorenzo Marini; Pietro Grande; Vincenzo Gentile; Roberto Piergentili
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.