Literature DB >> 21928933

Shared cognitive processes underlying past and future thinking: the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on event specificity.

Rachel J Anderson1, Stephen A Dewhurst, Robert A Nash.   

Abstract

Recent literature has argued that whereas remembering the past and imagining the future make use of shared cognitive substrates, simulating future events places heavier demands on executive resources. These propositions were explored in 3 experiments comparing the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on speed and accuracy of past event retrieval and future event simulation. Results provide support for the suggestion that both past and future episodes can be constructed through 2 mechanisms: a noneffortful "direct" pathway and a controlled, effortful "generative" pathway. However, limited evidence emerged for the suggestion that simulating of future, compared with retrieving past, episodes places heavier demands on executive resources; only under certain conditions did it emerge as a more error prone and lengthier process. The findings are discussed in terms of how retrieval and simulation make use of the same cognitive substrates in subtly different ways. 2012 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928933     DOI: 10.1037/a0025451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm.

Authors:  Scott N Cole; Søren R Staugaard; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  Functions of spontaneous and voluntary future thinking: evidence from subjective ratings.

Authors:  J Duffy; S N Cole
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-21

3.  Sketching to remember: episodic free recall task support for child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Michelle L A Mattison; Coral J Dando; Thomas C Ormerod
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-06

4.  Differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to self-projection and self-referential processing.

Authors:  Jake Kurczek; Emily Wechsler; Shreya Ahuja; Unni Jensen; Neal J Cohen; Daniel Tranel; Melissa Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Acting with the future in mind is impaired in long-term opiate users.

Authors:  Gill Terrett; Amanda Lyons; Julie D Henry; Clare Ryrie; Thomas Suddendorf; Peter G Rendell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Subjective judgments on direct and generative retrieval of autobiographical memory: The role of interoceptive sensibility and emotion.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumoto; Lynn Ann Watson; Masahiro Fujino; Yuichi Ito; Masanori Kobayashi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-16

7.  Afterlife future thinking: imagining oneself beyond death.

Authors:  Worawach Tungjitcharoen; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-04-12

8.  Could direct and generative retrieval be two flips of the same coin? A dual-task paradigm study.

Authors:  Daniele Gatti; Eszter Somos; Giuliana Mazzoni; Tjeerd Jellema
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 9.  The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis; Demis Hassabis; Victoria C Martin; R Nathan Spreng; Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  "I can see clearly now": the effect of cue imageability on mental time travel.

Authors:  Katrine W Rasmussen; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.