Literature DB >> 21928354

The ABC of non-inferiority margin setting from indirect comparisons.

Steven A Julious1.   

Abstract

In a non-inferiority trial to assess a new investigative treatment, there may need to be consideration of an indirect comparison with placebo using the active control in the current trial. We can, therefore, use the fact that there is a common active control in the comparisons of the investigative treatment and placebo. In analysing a non-inferiority trial, the ABC of: Assay sensitivity, Bias minimisation and Constancy assumption needs to be considered. It is highlighted how the ABC assumptions can potentially fail when there is placebo creep or a patient population shift. In this situation, the belief about the placebo response expressed in terms of a prior probability in Bayesian formulation could be used with the observed treatment effects to set the non-inferiority limit.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928354     DOI: 10.1002/pst.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  2 in total

1.  Defining the noninferiority margin and analysing noninferiority: An overview.

Authors:  Turki A Althunian; Anthonius de Boer; Rolf H H Groenwold; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  An investigation of the constancy of effect in Cochrane systematic reviews in context with the assumptions for noninferiority trials.

Authors:  Enass M Duro; Steven A Julious; Shijie Ren
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.612

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.