Literature DB >> 21928156

Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Kenneth A Buckwalter1, Chen Lin, Jason M Ford.   

Abstract

Orthopedic hardware should not be considered a contraindication to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The hardware alloy, the geometry of the hardware, and the orientation of the hardware all affect the magnitude of image artifacts. For commonly encountered alloys, the severity of image artifacts is similar for CT and MR. Cobalt chrome or stainless steel hardware produces the most artifacts; titanium hardware produces the least. In general, image artifacts are most severe adjacent to the hardware. CT image artifacts are related to incomplete X-ray projection data resulting in streaks. These can be mitigated by increasing scan technique and using a smoother reconstruction filter. Hardware with a rectangular cross-sectional shape such as a fixation plate will cause more artifacts than a radially symmetrical device such as an intramedullary nail. Image artifacts at MR are caused by the hardware magnetic susceptibility and the induction of eddy currents within the metal. A turbo spin-echo sequence yields the best results. The use of larger image matrices, thinner slices, and a wide receiver bandwidth are recommended parameter adjustments when imaging patients with hardware. This article discusses how hardware-related artifacts can be minimized by altering scan technique and image reconstruction. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928156     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1286013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol        ISSN: 1089-7860            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

1.  Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography Using 99mTc-labeled Leukocytes for Evaluating Infection Associated with a Cranial Implant in a Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Kathryn A Guerriero; Steven R Wilson; Albert J Sinusas; Lawrence Saperstein; Andcaroline J Zeiss
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Total ankle arthroplasty: optimizing computed tomography imaging protocol.

Authors:  Ia Kohonen; Helka Koivu; Tero Vahlberg; Heli Larjava; Kimmo Mattila
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Dual-layer spectral computerized tomography for metal artifact reduction: small versus large orthopedic devices.

Authors:  Christos Kosmas; Mojgan Hojjati; Peter C Young; Aidin Abedi; Ali Gholamrezanezhad; Prabhakar Rajiah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Monitoring and risk of progression of osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael D Ries; Thomas M Link
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The Carbofix™ "Piccolo Proximal femur nail": A new perspective for treating proximal femur lesion. A technique report.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Antonella Soriani; Barbara Rossi; Nicola Salducca; Roberto Biagini
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-06

6.  Carbon fiber intramedullary nails reduce artifact in postoperative advanced imaging.

Authors:  Melissa N Zimel; Sinchun Hwang; Elyn R Riedel; John H Healey
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Hip Arthroplasty Pseudotumors: Pathogenesis, Imaging, and Clinical Decision Making.

Authors:  Derik L Davis; James J Morrison
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2016-04-29

8.  Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography.

Authors:  Carlos A Peña-Solórzano; Matthew R Dimmock; David W Albrecht; David M Paganin; Richard B Bassed; Mitzi Klein; Peter C Harris
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2018-09-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.