Literature DB >> 21927677

Is it necessary to use prophylactics for preventing PONV?

Jae Hang Shim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21927677      PMCID: PMC3167126          DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.2.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 2005-6419


× No keyword cloud information.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing postsurgical symptoms [1] which continue to be a significant concern for anesthesiologists. PONV occurs in 20% to 30% of the general population underwent surgery and in up to 70% to 80% of high risk patients [2,3]. PONV is a complex physiologic phenomenon involving multiple neurophysiologic pathways with both central and peripheral receptor mechanisms. A variety of factors have been associated with an increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The most frequently described patient-specific risk factors for PONV are female gender, non-smokers, types of surgery such as laparoscopic surgery [4,5] or head and neck surgery, previous history of PONV or motion sickness, and use of intra-operative or postoperative opioids [3]. Postoperative analgesia with opioids is associated with an incidence of PONV of over 30% [6]. Thyroidectomy is also associated with a relatively high incidence of PONV. The incidence of PONV after thyroidectomy has a reporting rate of 60-76% according to previous study [7]. PONV after thyroidectomy surgery might be the main source of discomfort, and it may be perceived as the most unpleasant aspect of postoperative recovery [8]. Being able to identify patient-specific risk factors should help clinicians determine appropriate prophylactic treatment for PONV. Many clinicians have used different types of anti-emetics such as anticholinergic drug, 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonist or NK-1 antagonist for the treatment of PONV. Ramosetron is a newly developed 5-HT3 receptors antagonist with a more potent and longer receptor antagonizing effect compared with other 5-HT3 receptors antagonists [9]. In this issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, Lee et al. [10] report on the antiemetic effect of ramosetron with thyroidectomy for PONV. This clinical trial demonstrates the preventative effect of ramosetron for PONV in women undergoing total thyroidectomy with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The authors concluded that ramosetron was effective at reducing the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea in women that underwent total thyroidectomy with propofol-based TIVA during first 6 hours postoperatively. Nevertheless there are some debatable points in this paper. The incidences of postoperative nausea in the control and the ramosetron groups were 29% and 12% during first 6 postoperative hours respectively. From a statistical point of view, ramosetron is obviously more effective than control during first 6 postoperative hours (P = 0.029). But there were no differences between ramosetron and control (saline) after 6 hours postoperatively. Also postoperative vomiting was not different all time periods on both groups. The incidence of PONV on the control group was not that high and widely different compared to the ramosetron group in this study as the authors mentioned. While many practitioners believe that 5-HT3 antagonists are relatively safe medications, it is uncertain whether the antiemetic effects of 5-HT3 antagonists are better than inexpensive drugs such as droperidol or metoclopramide clinically. There is also uncertainty about benefit of ramosetron in patients undergoing TIVA. Cost-effective management is often referred to as an important medical issue. Recently, medical budgets are not sufficient for medical services of all patients in our country. Therefore, we need to be concerned about reduction of medical costs. In Korea, ramosetron (approximately US $55 for 0.3 mg) is much more expensive than other commonly used antiemetics, such as metoclopramide. Many risk scoring systems for predicting PONV have been mentioned at present [3]. An evaluation of these risk factors allows clinicians to appropriately plan for prophylaxis and treatment of PONV. Eberhart suggests the use of simplified algorithms that could lead to a benefit for a larger proportion of patients [11]. Clearly, such a risk score-adapted preventive strategy for PONV may be viewed as an efficient method for PONV treatment. The first strategy in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting is to reduce the baseline risk factors for each patient. Patients with a low risk of PONV generally do not require prophylactic medication. Patients at moderate or high risk should receive antiemetic therapy with high cost-effective drugs. Additionally, inexpensive and comprehensive multimodal managements for preventing PONV should be considered perioperatively. The use of propofol and the avoidance of nitrous oxide add to reductions of the incidence of PONV [12,13]. Other simple methods such as maintaining adequate hydration, minimizing the use of opioid analgesics for preventing postoperative pain in high risk patients, and P-6 acupoint stimulation [14] are also available.
  13 in total

1.  A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers.

Authors:  C C Apfel; E Läärä; M Koivuranta; C A Greim; N Roewer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Risk scores for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting are clinically useful tools and should be used in every patient: con--'life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated'.

Authors:  Leopold H J Eberhart; Astrid M Morin
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Nausea and vomiting following thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Authors:  J M Sonner; J M Hynson; O Clark; J A Katz
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  Face-lift complications: a study of 922 cases performed in a 6-year period.

Authors:  D P Thompson; F L Ashley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The efficacy of several neuromuscular monitoring modes at the P6 acupuncture point in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Yong H Kim; Kyo S Kim; Hee J Lee; Jae C Shim; Sung W Yoon
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Efficacy and complications of patient-controlled analgesia treatment after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Reuven Gepstein; Zeev Arinzon; Yoram Folman; Ishay Shuval; Shay Shabat
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2007-04

7.  Ramosetron for the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis: a prospective randomized comparison with granisetron.

Authors:  Y K Kang; Y H Park; B Y Ryoo; Y J Bang; K S Cho; D B Shin; H C Kim; K H Lee; Y S Park; K S Lee; D S Heo; S Y Kim; E K Cho; H Y Lim; W K Kim; J A Lee; T Y Kim; J C Lee; H J Yoon; N K Kim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Christian C Apfel; Kari Korttila; Mona Abdalla; Heinz Kerger; Alparslan Turan; Ina Vedder; Carmen Zernak; Klaus Danner; Ritva Jokela; Stuart J Pocock; Stefan Trenkler; Markus Kredel; Andreas Biedler; Daniel I Sessler; Norbert Roewer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of surgical site and patient's history with a simplified risk score for the prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  C C Apfel; P Kranke; L H J Eberhart
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Post-operative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: comparison between propofol and sevoflurane.

Authors:  Helen Ki Shinn; Mi Hyeon Lee; Sin Yeong Moon; Sung-Il Hwang; Choon Soo Lee; Hyun Kyoung Lim; Jang-Ho Song
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.