Literature DB >> 21926987

APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment.

Jörg Mansfeld1, Philippe Collin, Mark O Collins, Jyoti S Choudhary, Jonathon Pines.   

Abstract

Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis depends on the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which monitors kinetochore attachment to the mitotic spindle. Unattached kinetochores generate mitotic checkpoint proteins complexes (MCCs) that bind and inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex, or cyclosome (APC/C). How the SAC proficiently inhibits the APC/C but still allows its rapid activation when the last kinetochore attaches to the spindle is important for the understanding of how cells maintain genomic stability. We show that the APC/C subunit APC15 is required for the turnover of the APC/C co-activator CDC20 and release of MCCs during SAC signalling but not for APC/C activity per se. In the absence of APC15, MCCs and ubiquitylated CDC20 remain 'locked' onto the APC/C, which prevents the ubiquitylation and degradation of cyclin B1 when the SAC is satisfied. We conclude that APC15 mediates the constant turnover of CDC20 and MCCs on the APC/C to allow the SAC to respond to the attachment state of kinetochores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926987      PMCID: PMC3188299          DOI: 10.1038/ncb2347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  45 in total

1.  The RING-H2 finger protein APC11 and the E2 enzyme UBC4 are sufficient to ubiquitinate substrates of the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  M Gmachl; C Gieffers; A V Podtelejnikov; M Mann; J M Peters
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Identification of a MAD2-binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Habu; Sang Hoon Kim; Jasminder Weinstein; Tomohiro Matsumoto
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The Doc1 subunit is a processivity factor for the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  Christopher W Carroll; David O Morgan
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Proteomics analysis identifies new components of the fission and budding yeast anaphase-promoting complexes.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Yoon; Anna Feoktistova; Benjamin A Wolfe; Jennifer L Jennings; Andrew J Link; Kathleen L Gould
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase.

Authors:  P Clute; J Pines
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2.

Authors:  M Dobles; V Liberal; M L Scott; R Benezra; P K Sorger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Orderly inactivation of the key checkpoint protein mitotic arrest deficient 2 (MAD2) during mitotic progression.

Authors:  Hoi Tang Ma; Randy Y C Poon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Mnd2 and Swm1 are core subunits of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  Mark C Hall; Matthew P Torres; Gottfried K Schroeder; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2.

Authors:  V Sudakin; G K Chan; T J Yen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores.

Authors:  Claire Ditchfield; Victoria L Johnson; Anthony Tighe; Rebecca Ellston; Carolyn Haworth; Trevor Johnson; Andrew Mortlock; Nicholas Keen; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  73 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Understanding the structural basis for controlling chromosome division.

Authors:  David Barford
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The biochemistry of mitosis.

Authors:  Samuel Wieser; Jonathon Pines
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Role of CCT chaperonin in the disassembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes.

Authors:  Sharon Kaisari; Danielle Sitry-Shevah; Shirly Miniowitz-Shemtov; Adar Teichner; Avram Hershko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The dual role of the centrosome in organizing the microtubule network in interphase.

Authors:  Maria P Gavilan; Pablo Gandolfo; Fernando R Balestra; Francisco Arias; Michel Bornens; Rosa M Rios
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Mad2 Overexpression Uncovers a Critical Role for TRIP13 in Mitotic Exit.

Authors:  Daniel Henry Marks; Rozario Thomas; Yvette Chin; Riddhi Shah; Christine Khoo; Robert Benezra
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 7.  Posing the APC/C E3 Ubiquitin Ligase to Orchestrate Cell Division.

Authors:  Edmond R Watson; Nicholas G Brown; Jan-Michael Peters; Holger Stark; Brenda A Schulman
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 8.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  Cdc20: a potential novel therapeutic target for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Zhiwei Wang; Lixin Wan; Jiateng Zhong; Hiroyuki Inuzuka; Pengda Liu; Fazlul H Sarkar; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

10.  Disruption of the anaphase-promoting complex confers resistance to TTK inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  K L Thu; J Silvester; M J Elliott; W Ba-Alawi; M H Duncan; A C Elia; A S Mer; P Smirnov; Z Safikhani; B Haibe-Kains; T W Mak; D W Cescon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.