BACKGROUND: The best management of patients with isolated blunt thoracic trauma at high risk of pulmonary complications (HRPC-BTT: ≥3 isolated rib fractures, sternal fracture, single or few pulmonary contusions or minimal pneumothorax) is still unclear. We compared efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new clinical pathway involving an Emergency Department Observation Unit (EDOU) with routine care. DESIGN: Retrospective before-after study. SETTING: Level II Trauma Center within a Regional Teaching Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of patients with HRPC-BTT. INTERVENTIONS: a new clinical pathway involving EDOU was implemented. MAIN OUTCOMES: Death rate, tube thoracostomy, and re-admission of discharged patients. Hospital admission rate, length of hospital occupancy, overall costs, and cost-effectiveness were also compared in pre- and post-EDOU period. RESULTS: Two hundred forty patients were eligible for the study: 110 patients in the pre-EDOU period and 130 in the post-EDOU period. Thirteen (12%) of the treated patients were re-admitted to the ED in the pre-EDOU period compared with only five (4%) when the EDOU was available (p = 0.03). The rate of tube thoracostomy performed in admitted patients significantly increased after EDOU implementation: 1 of 54 (1.9%) versus 4 of 32 (12.5%; p < 0.05). The rate of hospitalization decreased from 49% in the pre-EDOU period to 24% in the post-EDOU period (p < 0,005) and the length of stay in hospital in the pre-EDOU period was longer than in the EDOU period: mean 94.7 ± 79.6 versus 65.7 ± 60.6, respectively (p < 0.02). Cost analysis revealed no relevant change in cost-effectiveness per patient (median; interquartile range): €487; €103 to 1959 versus €616; €124 to 1455, respectively, in the pre- and post-EDOU period. CONCLUSIONS: In managing patients affected by HRPC-BTT, a clinical pathway involving the EDOU seems to be more effective than routine care with little impact on cost.
BACKGROUND: The best management of patients with isolated blunt thoracic trauma at high risk of pulmonary complications (HRPC-BTT: ≥3 isolated rib fractures, sternal fracture, single or few pulmonary contusions or minimal pneumothorax) is still unclear. We compared efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new clinical pathway involving an Emergency Department Observation Unit (EDOU) with routine care. DESIGN: Retrospective before-after study. SETTING: Level II Trauma Center within a Regional Teaching Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of patients with HRPC-BTT. INTERVENTIONS: a new clinical pathway involving EDOU was implemented. MAIN OUTCOMES: Death rate, tube thoracostomy, and re-admission of discharged patients. Hospital admission rate, length of hospital occupancy, overall costs, and cost-effectiveness were also compared in pre- and post-EDOU period. RESULTS: Two hundred forty patients were eligible for the study: 110 patients in the pre-EDOU period and 130 in the post-EDOU period. Thirteen (12%) of the treated patients were re-admitted to the ED in the pre-EDOU period compared with only five (4%) when the EDOU was available (p = 0.03). The rate of tube thoracostomy performed in admitted patients significantly increased after EDOU implementation: 1 of 54 (1.9%) versus 4 of 32 (12.5%; p < 0.05). The rate of hospitalization decreased from 49% in the pre-EDOU period to 24% in the post-EDOU period (p < 0,005) and the length of stay in hospital in the pre-EDOU period was longer than in the EDOU period: mean 94.7 ± 79.6 versus 65.7 ± 60.6, respectively (p < 0.02). Cost analysis revealed no relevant change in cost-effectiveness per patient (median; interquartile range): €487; €103 to 1959 versus €616; €124 to 1455, respectively, in the pre- and post-EDOU period. CONCLUSIONS: In managing patients affected by HRPC-BTT, a clinical pathway involving the EDOU seems to be more effective than routine care with little impact on cost.
Authors: Edward Baker; Alison Woolley; Andreas Xyrichis; Christine Norton; Philip Hopkins; Geraldine Lee Journal: Injury Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Kate Curtis; Connie Van; Mary Lam; Stephen Asha; Annalise Unsworth; Alana Clements; Louise Atkins Journal: J Clin Nurs Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 3.036