Literature DB >> 21926618

The controversy about controls for fetal blood group genotyping by cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma.

Peter G Scheffer1, Masja de Haas, C Ellen van der Schoot.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fetal blood group genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma is routinely performed in alloimmunized women and has been introduced for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The necessity to control for extraction of fetal DNA in these tests is questioned by many. This review describes the various types of controls for preventing false-negative results and discusses their value. RECENT
FINDINGS: Polymorphic markers like short tandem repeats, insertion/deletion polymorphisms or single nucleotide polymorphisms can be used as a fetal DNA control in pregnancies in which a Y-chromosome marker is not applicable, but workload is considerable and more than 99% coverage is only reached on platforms allowing high level of multiplexing. Recently, the universal fetal marker RASSF1A has been introduced, enabling the demonstration of fetal DNA after methylation-sensitive digestion of maternal DNA. The analysis of recently published noninvasive fetal blood group genotyping studies showed that false-negative results were only encountered in studies lacking a control for the presence of fetal DNA, albeit at a low frequency of 0.1-0.2%.
SUMMARY: Because of the potentially severe consequences of false-negative results in alloimmunized women, a blood group antigen-negative result should in these cases only be issued if fetal DNA is demonstrated. However, the low frequency of false-negative results makes it acceptable to perform screening studies without a fetal marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926618     DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32834bab2d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol        ISSN: 1065-6251            Impact factor:   3.284


  7 in total

1.  Molecular typing for blood group antigens within 40 min by direct polymerase chain reaction from plasma or serum.

Authors:  Franz F Wagner; Willy A Flegel; Rita Bittner; Andrea Döscher
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 2.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Immunohematology-Clinical, Technical and Ethical Considerations.

Authors:  Jens Kjeldsen-Kragh; Åsa Hellberg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Prenatal non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: diagnostic accuracy of a test as a guide for appropriate administration of antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis.

Authors:  Silvia Manfroi; Chiara Calisesi; Pietro Fagiani; Annalisa Gabriele; Gianluca Lodi; Simonetta Nucci; Susanna Pelliconi; Laura Righini; Vanda Randi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing in Noninvasive Fetal Molecular Blood Group Genotyping.

Authors:  Sandra Wienzek-Lischka; Sandy Bachmann; Vanessa Froehner; Gregor Bein
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Reliable Determination of Fetal RhD Status by RHD Genotyping from Maternal Plasma.

Authors:  Tadeja Dovč-Drnovšek; Polona Klemenc; Nataša Toplak; Tanja Blejec; Irena Bricl; Primož Rožman
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Algorithm development and diagnostic accuracy testing for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Disha Parchure; Manisha Madkaikar; Swati Kulkarni
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.752

7.  Hypermethylated RASSF1A as Circulating Tumor DNA Marker for Disease Monitoring in Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Lieke M J van Zogchel; Esther M van Wezel; Jalenka van Wijk; Janine Stutterheim; Wassilis S C Bruins; Lily Zappeij-Kannegieter; Tirza J E Slager; Roswitha Schumacher-Kuckelkorn; Iedan R N Verly; C Ellen van der Schoot; Godelieve A M Tytgat
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-04-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.