RATIONALE: Despite recent advances in critical care and ventilator management, acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor may be beneficial for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether intravenous infusion of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor would improve clinical outcomes for patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor vs. placebo. The primary outcome was days alive and breathing without mechanical ventilatory support within the first 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included mortality and organ failure-free days. SETTING:Medical and surgical intensive care units at three academic medical centers. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty individuals with acute lung injury of at least 3 days duration were enrolled, out of a planned cohort of 200 subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (64 subjects, 250 μg/M) or placebo (66 subjects) by intravenous infusion daily for 14 days. Patients received mechanical ventilation using a lung-protective protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in ventilator-free days between groups (10.7 ± 10.3 days placebo vs. 10.8 ± 10.5 days granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, p = .82). Differences in 28-day mortality (23% in placebo vs. 17% in patients receiving granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (p = .31) and organ failure-free days (12.8 ± 11.3 days placebo vs. 15.7 ± 11.9 days granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, p = .16) were not statistically significant. There were similar numbers of serious adverse events in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized phase II trial, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor treatment did not increase the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. A larger trial would be required to determine whether treatment with granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor might alter important clinical outcomes, such as mortality or multiorgan failure. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00201409 [ClinicalTrials.gov]).
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Despite recent advances in critical care and ventilator management, acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor may be beneficial for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether intravenous infusion of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor would improve clinical outcomes for patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor vs. placebo. The primary outcome was days alive and breathing without mechanical ventilatory support within the first 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included mortality and organ failure-free days. SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care units at three academic medical centers. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty individuals with acute lung injury of at least 3 days duration were enrolled, out of a planned cohort of 200 subjects. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomized to receive human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (64 subjects, 250 μg/M) or placebo (66 subjects) by intravenous infusion daily for 14 days. Patients received mechanical ventilation using a lung-protective protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in ventilator-free days between groups (10.7 ± 10.3 days placebo vs. 10.8 ± 10.5 days granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, p = .82). Differences in 28-day mortality (23% in placebo vs. 17% in patients receiving granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (p = .31) and organ failure-free days (12.8 ± 11.3 days placebo vs. 15.7 ± 11.9 days granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, p = .16) were not statistically significant. There were similar numbers of serious adverse events in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized phase II trial, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor treatment did not increase the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. A larger trial would be required to determine whether treatment with granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor might alter important clinical outcomes, such as mortality or multiorgan failure. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00201409 [ClinicalTrials.gov]).
Authors: Carlos E O Baleeiro; Paul J Christensen; Susan B Morris; Michael P Mendez; Steven E Wilcoxen; Robert Paine Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2006-08-04 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Roy G Brower; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur Wheeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-05-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G Schelling; C Stoll; C Vogelmeier; T Hummel; J Behr; H P Kapfhammer; H B Rothenhäusler; M Haller; K Durst; T Krauseneck; J Briegel Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: B B Moore; M J Coffey; P Christensen; S Sitterding; R Ngan; C A Wilke; R McDonald; S M Phare; M Peters-Golden; R Paine; G B Toews Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Krisztián Németh; Asada Leelahavanichkul; Peter S T Yuen; Balázs Mayer; Alissa Parmelee; Kent Doi; Pamela G Robey; Kantima Leelahavanichkul; Beverly H Koller; Jared M Brown; Xuzhen Hu; Ivett Jelinek; Robert A Star; Eva Mezey Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jeffrey J Presneill; Trudi Harris; Alastair G Stewart; John F Cade; John W Wilson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: James H Finigan; Rangnath Mishra; Vihas T Vasu; Lori J Silveira; David E Nethery; Theodore J Standiford; Ellen L Burnham; Marc Moss; Jeffrey A Kern Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Markus Bosmann; Jamison J Grailer; Robert Ruemmler; Norman F Russkamp; Firas S Zetoune; J Vidya Sarma; Theodore J Standiford; Peter A Ward Journal: FASEB J Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Dustin C Krutsinger; Kelly L O'Leary; Susan S Ellenberg; Cody E Cotner; Scott D Halpern; Katherine R Courtright Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-09
Authors: Charles R Evans; Alla Karnovsky; Melissa A Kovach; Theodore J Standiford; Charles F Burant; Kathleen A Stringer Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Ellen L Burnham; William J Janssen; David W H Riches; Marc Moss; Gregory P Downey Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 16.671