Literature DB >> 21926570

Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults in the Dressing Study.

Carole Schwebel1, Jean-Christophe Lucet, Aurélien Vesin, Xavier Arrault, Silvia Calvino-Gunther, Lila Bouadma, Jean-François Timsit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The randomized two-way factorial Dressing Study (1,636 patients, 28,931 catheter days) showed that a chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge decreased the incidence of major catheter-related infections from 1.4‰ to 0.6‰ catheter days, and that scheduled dressing changes every 7 days was not inferior to scheduled changes every 3 days. Here, we assessed the cost benefits of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge use.
METHODS: Costs directly related to major catheter-related infections and the costs of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge and contact dermatitis were calculated prospectively using microcosting methods during the original study. The added length of stay in the intensive care unit due to major catheter-related infection was estimated using the disability model and assuming a cost of $2,118/intensive care unit day. The cost of each strategy was estimated based on all costs and on the probability of major catheter-related infection according to the Dressing Study results.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
RESULTS: Median direct cost of major catheter-related infection was $792. Estimated added length of stay due to major catheter-related infection was 11 days (95% confidence interval [-2 days; 26 days]). Overall cost of major catheter-related infection was $24,090/episode. Each dressing cost $9.08 (146 observations) and each chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge cost $9.73. Assuming a baseline major catheter-related infection incidence of 1.4‰ catheter days, chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge use saved $197 per patient with the 3-day chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing change strategy, and $83 with the 7-day standard dressing change strategy. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge use remained cost saving assuming a baseline major catheter-related infection incidence as low as 0.35‰ catheter days, or an overall cost per major catheter-related infections of up to $4,400.
CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge for arterial and central venous catheters saves money by preventing major catheter-related infections, even in intensive care units with low baseline major catheter-related infection levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00417235.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21926570     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  23 in total

1.  What's new in catheter-related infection: skin cleansing and skin antisepsis.

Authors:  Olivier Mimoz; Vineet Chopra; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Quasi-experimental study of sodium citrate locks and the risk of acute hemodialysis catheter infection among critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Parienti; Stéphanie Deryckère; Bruno Mégarbane; Xavier Valette; Amélie Seguin; Bertrand Sauneuf; Jean-Paul Mira; Bertrand Souweine; Vincent Cattoir; Cédric Daubin; Damien du Cheyron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates: how low can you go?

Authors:  Stijn Blot; Garyphallia Poulakou; Jean-Francois Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Reducing central line infections in pediatric and neonatal patients.

Authors:  Simon Li; Edward Vincent S Faustino; Sergio G Golombek
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Understanding biofilm formation in intravascular device-related infections.

Authors:  Christophe Beloin; Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo; David Lebeaux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.

Authors:  H P Loveday; J A Wilson; R J Pratt; M Golsorkhi; A Tingle; A Bak; J Browne; J Prieto; M Wilcox
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis*.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; John C O'Horo; Aiman Ghufran; Allison Bearden; Maria Eugenia Didier; Dan Chateau; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Substantial harm associated with failure of chronic paediatric central venous access devices.

Authors:  Amanda J Ullman; Tricia Kleidon; Marie Cooke; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 9.  Infectious complications of cardiac surgery: a clinical review.

Authors:  Matthew E Cove; Denis W Spelman; Graeme MacLaren
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 10.  Cost and health care utilization in ARDS--different from other critical illness?

Authors:  Thomas Bice; Christopher E Cox; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 3.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.