Literature DB >> 21926373

A dose-ranging study of the effect of transversus abdominis block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after outpatient laparoscopy.

Gildasio S De Oliveira1, Paul C Fitzgerald, R-Jay Marcus, Shireen Ahmad, Robert J McCarthy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain can delay functional recovery after outpatient surgery. Multimodal analgesia can improve pain and possibly improve quality of recovery. In this study, we evaluated the dose-dependent effects of a preoperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on patient recovery using the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire after ambulatory gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Global QoR-40 scores range from 40 to 200, representing very poor to outstanding quality of recovery, respectively.
METHODS: Healthy women undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopy were randomly allocated to receive a preoperative TAP block using saline, ropivacaine 0.25%, or ropivacaine 0.5%. Needle placement for the TAP blocks was performed using ultrasound guidance and 15 mL of the study solution was injected bilaterally by a blinded investigator. QoR-40 score and analgesic use were assessed 24 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was global QoR-40 score at 24 hours after surgery. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were made using the Dunn test with P values and 95% confidence intervals Bonferroni corrected for 6 comparisons.
RESULTS: Seventy-five subjects were enrolled and 70 subjects completed the study. The median (range) for the QoR-40 score after the TAP block was 157 (127-193), 173 (133-195), and 172 (130-196) for the saline group and 0.25% and 0.5% ropivacaine groups, respectively. The median difference (99.2% confidence interval) in QoR-40 score for 0.5% bupivacaine (16 [1-30], P=0.03) and 0.25% bupivacaine (17 [2-31], P=0.01) was more than saline but not significantly different between ropivacaine groups (-1 [-16 to 12], P=1.0). Increased global QoR-40 scores correlated with decreased area under the pain score time curve during postanesthesia recovery room stay (ρ=-0.56, 99.2% upper confidence limit [UCL]=-0.28), 24-hour opioid consumption (ρ=-0.61, 99.2% UCL=-0.34), pain score (0-10 scale) at 24 hours (ρ=-0.53, 99.2% UCL=-0.25), and time to discharge readiness (ρ=-0.65, 99.2% UCL=-0.42). The aforementioned variables were lower in the TAP block groups receiving ropivacaine compared with saline.
CONCLUSIONS: The TAP block is an effective adjunct in a multimodal analgesic strategy for ambulatory laparoscopic procedures. TAP blocks with ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5% reduced pain, decreased opioid consumption, and provided earlier discharge readiness that was associated with better quality of recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926373     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182303a1a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  26 in total

1.  Transversus abdominis plane block with 0.25 % levobupivacaine: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study.

Authors:  Takashi Ishida; Akiyuki Sakamoto; Hidenori Tanaka; Susumu Ide; Kumiko Ishida; Satoshi Tanaka; Teruyo Mori; Mikito Kawamata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Zhao; Yao Tong; Hao Ren; Xi-Bing Ding; Xin Wang; Jia-Ying Zong; Shu-Qing Jin; Quan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 3.  Clinical safety and effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in post-operative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Joanna K Duncan; Anje J Scarfe; Susanne Schuhmann; Alun L Cameron
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Transversus abdominis plane infiltration for laparoscopic gastric banding: A pilot study.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Paul Fitzgerald; Shireen Ahmad; John Kim; Rohit Rahangdale; Robert McCarthy
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-27

5.  Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks via Laparoscopically Placed Catheters for Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Alfred M Said; Hany A Balamoun
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Preventive analgesia by local anesthetics: the reduction of postoperative pain by peripheral nerve blocks and intravenous drugs.

Authors:  Antje Barreveld; Jürgen Witte; Harkirat Chahal; Marcel E Durieux; Gary Strichartz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Systemic lidocaine to improve quality of recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Kenyon Duncan; Paul Fitzgerald; Antoun Nader; Robert W Gould; Robert J McCarthy
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Comparison of the effectiveness of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with profound muscle relaxation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to optimize the quality of recovery during the early post-operative phase: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Gert J Scheffer; Albert Dahan; Janneke E E A Mulder; Simone A A Willems; Luuk B Hilbrands; Frank C H d'Ancona; Rogier A R T Donders; Kees J H M van Laarhoven; Michiel C Warlé
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Intravenous patient-controlled fentanyl with and without transversus abdominis plane block in cirrhotic patients post liver resection.

Authors:  Manar Serag Eldin; Fatma Mahmoud; Rabab El Hassan; Mohamed Abdel Raouf; Mohamed H Afifi; Khaled Yassen; Wesam Morad
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2014-05-29

10.  The impact of multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol on quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhiyu Geng; Hui Bi; Dai Zhang; Changji Xiao; Han Song; Ye Feng; Xinni Cao; Xueying Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.