Literature DB >> 21926182

A novel method for analyzing sequential eye movements reveals strategic influence on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.

Taylor R Hayes1, Alexander A Petrov, Per B Sederberg.   

Abstract

Eye movements are an important data source in vision science. However, the vast majority of eye movement studies ignore sequential information in the data and utilize only first-order statistics. Here, we present a novel application of a temporal-difference learning algorithm to construct a scanpath successor representation (SR; P. Dayan, 1993) that captures statistical regularities in temporally extended eye movement sequences. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the scanpath SR on eye movement data from participants solving items from Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Analysis of the SRs revealed individual differences in scanning patterns captured by two principal components that predicted individual Raven scores much better than existing methods. These scanpath SR components were highly interpretable and provided new insight into the role of strategic processing on the Raven test. The success of the scanpath SR in terms of prediction and interpretability suggests that this method could prove useful in a much broader context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926182     DOI: 10.1167/11.10.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Do We Really Become Smarter When Our Fluid-Intelligence Test Scores Improve?

Authors:  Taylor R Hayes; Alexander A Petrov; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2015-01

2.  A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.

Authors:  Nitzan Guy; Hagar Azulay; Rasha Kardosh; Yarden Weiss; Ran R Hassin; Salomon Israel; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  From eye movements to scanpath networks: A method for studying individual differences in expository text reading.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Ma; Yikang Liu; Roy Clariana; Chanyuan Gu; Ping Li
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Do your eye movements reveal your performance on an IQ test? A study linking eye movements and socio-demographic information to fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Gjergji Kasneci; Ulrich Trautwein; Tobias Appel; Maike Tibus; Susanne M Jaeggi; Peter Gerjets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hierarchical learning induces two simultaneous, but separable, prediction errors in human basal ganglia.

Authors:  Carlos Diuk; Karin Tsai; Jonathan Wallis; Matthew Botvinick; Yael Niv
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Individual differences in learning and transfer: stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Michael J Cahill; Mathew Robbins; Chelsea Wiener
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-06-10

7.  Eye Movements Reveal Optimal Strategies for Analogical Reasoning.

Authors:  Michael S Vendetti; Ariel Starr; Elizabeth L Johnson; Kiana Modavi; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-02

8.  Scan patterns during scene viewing predict individual differences in clinical traits in a normative sample.

Authors:  Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Eye Movements and Cognitive Strategy in a Fluid Intelligence Test: Item Type Analysis.

Authors:  Paulo G Laurence; Tatiana P Mecca; Alexandre Serpa; Romain Martin; Elizeu C Macedo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-21

10.  Predicting Spatial Visualization Problems' Difficulty Level from Eye-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Rabih Younes; Diana Bairaktarova; Qi Guo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.