CONTEXT: Palliative care is often focused on cancer patients. Palliative sedation at the end of life is an intervention to address severe suffering in the last stage of life. OBJECTIVES: To study the practice of continuous palliative sedation for both cancer and noncancer patients. METHODS: In 2008, a structured questionnaire was sent to 1580 physicians regarding their last patient receiving continuous sedation until death. RESULTS: A total of 606 physicians (38%) filled out the questionnaire, of whom 370 (61%) reported on their last case of continuous sedation (cancer patients: n=282 [76%] and noncancer patients: n=88 [24%]). More often, noncancer patients were older, female, and not fully competent. Dyspnea (odds ratio [OR]=2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 3.72) and psychological exhaustion (OR=2.64; 95% CI: 1.26, 5.55) were more often a decisive indication for continuous sedation for these patients. A palliative care team was consulted less often for noncancer patients (OR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.96). Also, preceding sedation, euthanasia was discussed less often with noncancer patients (OR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.73), whereas their relatives more often initiated discussion about euthanasia than relatives of cancer patients (OR=3.75; 95% CI: 1.26, 11.20). CONCLUSION: The practice of continuous palliative sedation in patients dying of cancer differs from patients dying of other diseases. These differences seem to be related to the less predictable course of noncancer diseases, which may reduce physicians' awareness of the imminence of death. Increased attention to noncancer diseases in palliative care practice and research is, therefore, crucial as is more attention to the potential benefits of palliative care consultation.
CONTEXT: Palliative care is often focused on cancerpatients. Palliative sedation at the end of life is an intervention to address severe suffering in the last stage of life. OBJECTIVES: To study the practice of continuous palliative sedation for both cancer and noncancer patients. METHODS: In 2008, a structured questionnaire was sent to 1580 physicians regarding their last patient receiving continuous sedation until death. RESULTS: A total of 606 physicians (38%) filled out the questionnaire, of whom 370 (61%) reported on their last case of continuous sedation (cancerpatients: n=282 [76%] and noncancer patients: n=88 [24%]). More often, noncancer patients were older, female, and not fully competent. Dyspnea (odds ratio [OR]=2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 3.72) and psychological exhaustion (OR=2.64; 95% CI: 1.26, 5.55) were more often a decisive indication for continuous sedation for these patients. A palliative care team was consulted less often for noncancer patients (OR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.96). Also, preceding sedation, euthanasia was discussed less often with noncancer patients (OR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.73), whereas their relatives more often initiated discussion about euthanasia than relatives of cancerpatients (OR=3.75; 95% CI: 1.26, 11.20). CONCLUSION: The practice of continuous palliative sedation in patients dying of cancer differs from patients dying of other diseases. These differences seem to be related to the less predictable course of noncancer diseases, which may reduce physicians' awareness of the imminence of death. Increased attention to noncancer diseases in palliative care practice and research is, therefore, crucial as is more attention to the potential benefits of palliative care consultation.
Authors: Hilde T H van der Kallen; Natasja J H Raijmakers; Judith A C Rietjens; Alex A van der Male; Herman J Bueving; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Siebe J Swart; Agnes van der Heide; Lia van Zuylen; Roberto S G M Perez; Wouter W A Zuurmond; Paul J van der Maas; Johannes J M van Delden; Judith A C Rietjens Journal: CMAJ Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Stijn Vissers; Sigrid Dierickx; Lenzo Robijn; Joachim Cohen; Luc Deliens; Freddy Mortier; Kenneth Chambaere Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Marco H Blanker; Marlies Koerhuis-Roessink; Siebe J Swart; Wouter W A Zuurmond; Agnes van der Heide; Roberto S G M Perez; Judith A C Rietjens Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Ebun Abarshi; Judith Rietjens; Augusto Caraceni; Sheila Payne; Luc Deliens; Lieve Van Den Block Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Patrick Hoek; Ilse Grandjean; Constans A H H V M Verhagen; Marlies L E A Jansen-Landheer; Henk J Schers; Cilia Galesloot; Kris C P Vissers; Yvonne Engels; Jeroen G J Hasselaar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 3.240