Literature DB >> 2192567

Designing fee schedules by formulae, politics, and negotiations.

W A Glaser1.   

Abstract

Fee-for-service cannot be used successfully by organized health insurance without a fee schedule. America first tried to pay doctors under Medicare by an involved formula system without a fee schedule, but the effort has failed. The United States has now commissioned a research project to design a unique fee schedule that will precisely reflect physicians' effort and practice costs and that will represent the prices produced by a perfectly competitively market. The primary goal is the same as that pursued recently by reformers in all countries: viz., narrow the spread in fees and income between surgical and cognitive fields. There are serious technical limitations on this effort, despite the talent of the research team. An additional difficulty lies in the nature of the subject: paying the doctor involves conflicts of interest between payers and all doctors as well as among the medical specialties, and the conflicts cannot be resolved by any formulae calculated by any single research team. Methodological and political compromises will be necessary, in order to adopt a reform. The new method may be just as politically driven, complicated, and disputed as the old one, despite America's pretenses that it prefers free markets and opposes excessive government.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2192567      PMCID: PMC1404999          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  Using physician time and complexity to identify mispriced procedures.

Authors:  J Cromwell; J B Mitchell; M L Rosenbach; W B Stason; S Hurdle
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value study.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; D Dunn; E R Becker; M DeNicola; T R Ketcham
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. Toward the development of an alternative physician payment system.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; E R Becker; S R Thomas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Sounding boards. The UCR boondoggle: a death knell for private practice?

Authors:  B B Roe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Toward developing a relative value scale for medical and surgical services.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; W B Stason
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1979
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparing physician fee schedules in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  S J Katz; S Zuckerman; W P Welch
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1992
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.