Literature DB >> 2192546

Prediction of osteoporotic fractures in the general population by a fracture risk score. A 9-year follow-up among middle-aged women.

A M van Hemert1, J P Vandenbroucke, J C Birkenhäger, H A Valkenburg.   

Abstract

The possibility of predicting the occurrence of fractures on the basis of risk factors for osteoporosis was evaluated between 1975 and 1986 in a follow-up study of 1,014 women aged 45-64 years from a Dutch population sample. During the 9-year period of follow-up, 16% of the women experienced one or more fractures. Of 12 historical and radiologic risk factors for osteoporosis which are considered important in the biomedical literature, none were found to be strong indicators of future fractures. Complete information on risk factors was available for 742 women. A fracture risk score was calculated for each person by combining the simultaneous influence of several risk factors in a multivariate analysis. The risk score discriminated relatively well between women with high and low risks of fractures. The risk ratio between the highest and the lowest risk score quintiles was 6.4 for all fractures and 7.0 for type I osteoporotic fractures (fractures of the vertebral bodies and distal forearm). However, if belonging to the highest quintile was considered as a screening test for fracture prediction, the sensitivity and specificity were poor: 0.37 and 0.84, respectively, for all fractures and 0.48 and 0.83, respectively, for type I osteoporotic fractures. These results indicate that it might not be efficient to use risk factor status to select women for fracture prevention programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2192546     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  15 in total

1.  Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women.

Authors:  A M Van Hemert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-11-10

Review 2.  Strategies for prevention of osteoporosis and hip fracture.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; T W Meade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-24

3.  Genetic and environmental factors affecting bone mineral density in large families.

Authors:  S S Yeap; M Beaumont; A Bennett; N A Keating; D A White; D J Hosking
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Bone mineral density in relation to medical and lifestyle risk factors for osteoporosis in premenopausal, menopausal and postmenopausal women in general practice.

Authors:  A McKnight; K Steele; K Mills; C Gilchrist; H Taggart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Dietary calcium intake, physical activity and the risk of vertebral fracture in Chinese.

Authors:  H H Chan; E M Lau; J Woo; F Lin; A Sham; P C Leung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Early menopause, number of reproductive years, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D Kritz-Silverstein; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Parity, lactation and hip fracture.

Authors:  S Hoffman; J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; M D Gammon; L A O'Brien
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Assessment of the risk of osteoporosis at the menopause: therapeutic consequences.

Authors:  L G Raisz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Influence of breastfeeding and other reproductive factors on bone mass later in life.

Authors:  L J Melton; S C Bryant; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; G D Malkasian; H L Judd; B L Riggs
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by postural instability and bone density.

Authors:  T Nguyen; P Sambrook; P Kelly; G Jones; S Lord; J Freund; J Eisman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.