Literature DB >> 21924817

Bias observed in time-of-flight shear wave speed measurements using radiation force of a focused ultrasound beam.

Heng Zhao1, Pengfei Song, Matthew W Urban, Randall R Kinnick, Meng Yin, James F Greenleaf, Shigao Chen.   

Abstract

Measurement of shear wave propagation speed has important clinical applications because it is related to tissue stiffness and health state. Shear waves can be generated in tissues by the radiation force of a focused ultrasound beam (push beam). Shear wave speed can be measured by tracking its propagation laterally from the push beam focus using the time-of-flight principle. This study shows that shear wave speed measurements with such methods can be transducer, depth and lateral tracking range dependent. Three homogeneous phantoms with different stiffness were studied using curvilinear and linear array transducer. Shear wave speed measurements were made at different depths, using different aperture sizes for push and at different lateral distance ranges from the push beam. The curvilinear transducer shows a relatively large measurement bias that is depth dependent. The possible causes of the bias and options for correction are discussed. These bias errors must be taken into account to provide accurate and precise time-of-flight shear wave speed measurements for clinical use.
Copyright © 2011 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21924817      PMCID: PMC3199321          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  20 in total

1.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics.

Authors:  A P Sarvazyan; O V Rudenko; S D Swanson; J B Fowlkes; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective.

Authors:  K J Parker; M M Doyley; D J Rubens
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A finite-element method model of soft tissue response to impulsive acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Amy C Sharma; Richard R Bouchard; Roger W Nightingale; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Ultrasonic imaging of internal vibration of soft tissue under forced vibration.

Authors:  Y Yamakoshi; J Sato; T Sato
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Shear wave spectroscopy for in vivo quantification of human soft tissues visco-elasticity.

Authors:  Thomas Deffieux; Gabriel Montaldo; Mickaël Tanter; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Reliable measurement procedure of virtual touch tissue quantification with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Chie Kaminuma; Yoshito Tsushima; Noriko Matsumoto; Takemi Kurabayashi; Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi; Keigo Endo
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  36 in total

1.  Ultrasonic tracking of shear waves using a particle filter.

Authors:  Atul N Ingle; Chi Ma; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Shin; Myung-Joon Kim; Ha Yan Kim; Yun Ho Roh; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Characterization of Viscoelastic Materials Using Group Shear Wave Speeds.

Authors:  Ned C Rouze; Yufeng Deng; Courtney A Trutna; Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Two Point Method For Robust Shear Wave Phase Velocity Dispersion Estimation of Viscoelastic Materials.

Authors:  Piotr Kijanka; Lukasz Ambrozinski; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  External vibration multi-directional ultrasound shearwave elastography (EVMUSE): application in liver fibrosis staging.

Authors:  Heng Zhao; Pengfei Song; Duane D Meixner; Randall R Kinnick; Matthew R Callstrom; William Sanchez; Matthew W Urban; Armando Manduca; James F Greenleaf; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Multi-source and multi-directional shear wave generation with intersecting steered ultrasound push beams.

Authors:  Alireza Nabavizadeh; Pengfei Song; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Application of a forward model of axisymmetric shear wave propagation in viscoelastic media to shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Sanjay S Yengul; Paul E Barbone; Bruno Madore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE) with various ultrasound push beams.

Authors:  Pengfei Song; Matthew W Urban; Armando Manduca; Heng Zhao; James F Greenleaf; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Single tracking location methods suppress speckle noise in shear wave velocity estimation.

Authors:  Etana C Elegbe; Stephen A McAleavey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography on conventional ultrasound scanners with time-aligned sequential tracking (TAST) and comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE).

Authors:  Pengfei Song; Michael Macdonald; Russell Behler; Justin Lanning; Michael Wang; Matthew Urban; Armando Manduca; Heng Zhao; Matthew Callstrom; Azra Alizad; James Greenleaf; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.