Literature DB >> 21924547

Gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a randomized phase 2 study of the French Genitourinary Tumor Group (GETUG V01).

Stéphane Culine1, Aude Fléchon, Aline Guillot, Sylvestre Le Moulec, Damien Pouessel, Frédéric Rolland, Alain Ravaud, Nadine Houédé, Laurent Mignot, Florence Joly, Stéphane Oudard, Sophie Gourgou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal chemotherapy for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium who are not eligible for cisplatin remains to be defined.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the activity of gemcitabine alone (GEM) or in combination with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in a randomized phase 2 trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The primary end point was the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. The sample size was based on a two-stage Fleming design with p0=35% and p1=55%. At the end of the first stage designed to register 20 patients on each treatment arm, the observation of seven or more objective responses would have led to the inclusion of 30 more patients in each arm. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From July 2004 to March 2009, 44 patients in 10 centers were randomly assigned into the GEM or the GEMOX arm, 22 on each treatment arm. The median age was 76 yr. Seven patients were included for a performance status (PS) of 2 only. The remaining 37 patients had an impaired renal function, 11 of whom also had a PS of 2. The median creatinine clearance was 45 ml/min (range: 30-80 ml/min). The trial was closed after the first part because the GEMOX arm did not reach the targeted objective response rate to proceed further.
CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin does not add any significant activity (in terms of response rates) compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium who are ineligible for cisplatin. Copyright Â
© 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21924547     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

Review 1.  Treatment Approaches for Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  David J Einstein; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

2.  Systemic therapy for bladder cancer - a medical oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Benjamin A Teply; Jenny J Kim
Journal:  J Solid Tumors       Date:  2014

3.  Urothelial carcinoma management in elderly or unfit patients.

Authors:  Joaquim Bellmunt; Nicolas Mottet; Maria De Santis
Journal:  EJC Suppl       Date:  2016-03-22

4.  Vinflunine-gemcitabine versus vinflunine-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: results of an international randomized phase II trial (JASINT1).

Authors:  M De Santis; P J Wiechno; J Bellmunt; C Lucas; W-C Su; L Albiges; C-C Lin; E Senkus-Konefka; A Flechon; L Mourey; A Necchi; W C Loidl; M M Retz; N Vaissière; S Culine
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Second-line treatment strategy for urothelial cancer patients who progress or are unfit for cisplatin therapy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huitao Wang; Jianhe Liu; Kewei Fang; Changxing Ke; Yongming Jiang; Guang Wang; Tongxin Yang; Tao Chen; Xin Shi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.