Literature DB >> 21924545

Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort.

Thomas Hambrock1, Caroline Hoeks, Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Tom Scheenen, Jurgen Fütterer, Stefan Bouwense, Inge van Oort, Fritz Schröder, Henkjan Huisman, Jelle Barentsz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate pretreatment assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness is important in decision making. Gleason grade is a critical predictor of the aggressiveness of PCa. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies (TRUSBxs) show substantial undergrading of Gleason grades found after radical prostatectomy (RP). Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be a biomarker of tumour aggressiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To improve pretreatment assessment of PCa aggressiveness, this study prospectively evaluated MRI-guided prostate biopsies (MR-GBs) of abnormalities determined on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. The results were compared with a 10-core TRUSBx cohort. RP findings served as the gold standard. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 10-core TRUSBx (n=64) or MR-GB (n=34) was used for PCa diagnosis before RP in 98 patients. MEASUREMENTS: Using multiparametric 3-T MRI: T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and DWI were performed to identify tumour-suspicious regions in patients with a negative TRUSBx. The regions with the highest restriction on ADC maps within the suspicions regions were used to direct MR-GB. A 10-core TRUSBx was used in a matched cohort. Following RP, the highest Gleason grades (HGGs) in biopsies and RP specimens were identified. Biopsy and RP Gleason grade results were evaluated using chi-square analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: No significant differences on RP were observed for proportions of patients having a HGG of 3 (35% vs 28%; p=0.50), 4 (32% vs 41%; p=0.51), and 5 (32% vs 31%; p=0.61) for the MR-GB and TRUSBx cohort, respectively. MR-GB showed an exact performance with RP for overall HGG: 88% (30 of 34); for TRUS-GB it was 55% (35 of 64; p=0.001). In the MR-GB cohort, an exact performance with HGG 3 was 100% (12 of 12); for HGG 4, 91% (10 of 11); and for HGG 5, 73% (8 of 11). The corresponding performance rates for TRUSBx were 94% (17 of 18; p=0.41), 46% (12 of 26; p=0.02), and 30% (6 of 20; p=0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows prospectively that DWI-directed MR-GBs significantly improve pretreatment risk stratification by obtaining biopsies that are representative of true Gleason grade.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21924545     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  92 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: predicting tumor aggressiveness using DWI-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Periferic Prostate Cancer Detection and Stratification.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Francesca Patella; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Silvia Panella; Anna Maria Ierardi; Giovanni Guido Pompili; Giuseppe Franceschelli; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Alberto Magenta Biasina; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Hersh Chandarana; Nicole Hindman; Fang-Ming Deng; James S Babb; Samir S Taneja; Christian Geppert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Prostate cancer: MRI/US-guided biopsy--a viable alternative to TRUS-guidance.

Authors:  Wendy J M van de Ven; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Current trends and new frontiers in focal therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Melissa H Mendez; Daniel Y Joh; Rajan Gupta; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Sung Y Park; Chan K Kim; Jung J Park; Byung K Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Xiaosong Meng; Julien Le Nobin; James S Wysock; Herbert Lepor; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Recent advances in imaging-guided interventions for prostate cancers.

Authors:  Xia Wu; Feng Zhang; Ran Chen; Weiliang Zheng; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Kinzya B Grant; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.