Literature DB >> 21924397

Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.

Victoria Kapustian1, Eyal Y Anteby, Michael Gdalevich, Simon Shenhav, Ofer Lavie, Ofer Gemer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effect of nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section on the formation of adhesions. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized trial of 533 women undergoing primary cesarean section; in 256 the peritoneum was left open and in 277 it was closed. Fifty women in the nonclosure group and 47 women in the closure group were subsequently evaluated intraoperatively at a repeat cesarean. The presence of adhesions and their severity were evaluated at several sites.
RESULTS: The nonclosure and closure groups were comparable with regard to the proportion of patients with adhesions at any site (60% vs 51%, respectively; P = .31). Time from incision to delivery was comparable in the nonclosure and closure groups (8.98 ± 4.7 vs 9.32 ± 5.2 minutes, respectively; P = .84).
CONCLUSION: Closure or nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean section did not lead to large differences in the adhesion rate.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21924397     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  A review of Caesarean section techniques and postoperative thromboprophylaxis at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Chang Qi Hester Lau; Tuck Chin Tiffany Wong; Eng Loy Tan; Devendra Kanagalingam
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 2.  Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony A Bamigboye; G Justus Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-11

3.  Nonclosure of the Peritoneum during Appendectomy May Cause Less Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Authors:  Huseyin Kazim Bektasoglu; Mustafa Hasbahceci; Samet Yigman; Erkan Yardimci; Enver Kunduz; Fatma Umit Malya
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche): Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and Peritoneal Closure Debate.

Authors:  Shashikant L Sholapurkar
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-01-26

Review 6.  MRI findings of complications related to previous uterine scars.

Authors:  Leonor Alamo; Yvan Vial; Alban Denys; Gustav Andreisek; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Sabine Schmidt
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-01-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.