Literature DB >> 21922348

Venous access ports: indications, implantation technique, follow-up, and complications.

Eric M Walser1.   

Abstract

The subcutaneous venous access device (SVAD or "port") is a critical component in the care of patients with chronic disease. The modern SVAD provides reliable access for blood withdrawal and medication administration with minimal disruption to a patient's lifestyle. Because of improved materials and catheter technology, today's ports are lighter and stronger and capable of high-pressure injections of contrast for cross-sectional imaging. The majority of SVAD placement occurs in interventional radiology departments due to their ability to provide this service at lower costs, lower, complication rates, and greater volumes. Port-insertion techniques vary depending on the operator, but all consist of catheter placement in the central venous circulation followed by subcutaneous pocket creation and port attachment to the catheter with fixation and closure of the pocket. Venous access challenges occasionally occur in patients with central vein occlusions, necessitating catheterization of collateral veins or port placement in alternate locations. Complications of SVADs include those associated with the procedure as well as short- (<30 days) and long-term problems. Procedural and early complications are quite rare due to the near-universal use of real-time ultrasound guidance for vein puncture, but they can include hematoma, catheter malposition, arrhythmias, and pneumothorax. Late problems include both thrombotic complications (native venous or port-catheter thrombosis) and infections (tunnel or pocket infections or catheter-associated bloodstream infections). Most guidelines suggest that 0.3 infections/1000 catheter days is an appropriate upper threshold for the insertion of SVADs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922348     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0271-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  25 in total

1.  Spontaneous migration of an implanted central venous access device into the ipsilateral jugular vein.

Authors:  Brett L Houston; Matthew Yan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Value of superficial cultures for prediction of catheter-related bloodstream infection in long-term catheters: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Guembe; P Martín-Rabadán; A Echenagusia; F Camúñez; G Rodríguez-Rosales; G Simó; M Echenagusia; E Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Cost and Morbidity Analysis of Chest Port Insertion: Interventional Radiology Suite Versus Operating Room.

Authors:  Jennifer R LaRoy; Sarah B White; Thejus Jayakrishnan; Stephanie Dybul; Dirk Ungerer; Kiran Turaga; Parag J Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Jana Voelklein; Tobias Waggershauser; Maximilian F Reiser; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic complications of interventional radiology procedures.

Authors:  Mark L Lessne; Brian Holly; Steven Y Huang; Charles Y Kim
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Clearing obstructed totally implantable central venous access ports: an efficient protocol using a second needle.

Authors:  Sonia Muguet; Sébastien Couraud; Emilie Perrot; Isabelle Claer; Pierre Jean Souquet
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Masanobu Takahashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Endovascular stent-based revascularization of malignant superior vena cava syndrome with concomitant implantation of a port device using a dual venous approach.

Authors:  Susanne Anton; T Oechtering; E Stahlberg; F Jacob; M Kleemann; J Barkhausen; J P Goltz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.

Authors:  Moritz Wildgruber; Sebastian Borgmeyer; Bernhard Haller; Heike Jansen; Jochen Gaa; Marion Kiechle; Reinhard Meier; Johannes Ettl; Hermann Berger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Activity of ethanol and daptomycin lock on biofilm generated by an in vitro dynamic model using real subcutaneous injection ports.

Authors:  C Aumeran; P Guyot; M Boisnoir; C Robin-Hennequin; M Vidal; C Forestier; O Traore; O Lesens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.