Literature DB >> 21922271

Hospital drug and therapeutics committees in Australia: is there a role for economic evaluation at the institutional level?

Gisselle Gallego.   

Abstract

Decisions about spending on medicines occur at different levels in the Australian health care system. This commentary describes the role of economic evaluation at the institutional (public hospital) level. In contrast to the decisions taken at the level of Federal subsidy (listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) formal pharmacoeonomic data analyses are usually not available, and arguably often not relevant to decision making within the public hospital setting. Future research is needed to develop and explore models of best practice and how to incorporate pharmacoeconomic evidence into local decisions.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922271     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-011-9565-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  11 in total

1.  The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making. A European survey. The EUROMET group.

Authors:  C Hoffmann; J M Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Pharmacoeconomics and clinical practice guidelines. A survey of attitudes in Swedish formulary committees.

Authors:  A Anell; P Svarvar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The subsidy of pharmaceuticals in Australia: processes and challenges.

Authors:  Lloyd Sansom
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Prioritising drug and therapeutics committee (DTC) decisions: a national survey.

Authors:  Ee Lyn Tan; Richard O Day; Jo-anne E Brien
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-12-23

5.  Provision of pharmaceuticals in Australian hospitals: equity of access?

Authors:  Gisselle Gallego; Susan J Taylor; Jo-anne E Brien
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-12-06

6.  Economic evidence at the local level : options for making it more useful.

Authors:  Kees van Gool; Gisselle Gallego; Marion Haas; Rosalie Viney; Jane Hall; Robyn Ward
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities.

Authors:  Stuart Peacock; Danny Ruta; Craig Mitton; Cam Donaldson; Angela Bate; Madeleine Murtagh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-25

8.  Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Oya Eddama; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Funding and access to high cost medicines in public hospitals in Australia: decision-makers' perspectives.

Authors:  Gisselle Gallego; Susan Joyce Taylor; Jo-Anne Elizabeth Brien
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Drug and Therapeutics Committees in Australia: expected and actual performance.

Authors:  L M Weekes; C Brooks
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development, implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based program for introduction of new health technologies and clinical practices in a local healthcare setting.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Marie Garrubba; Kelly Allen; Richard King; Cate Kelly; Malar Thiagarajan; Beverley Castleman; Wayne Ramsey; Dina Farjou
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Sally Green; Wayne Ramsey; Kelly Allen; Richard King
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Sally Green; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.