Literature DB >> 21922194

Locked antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures.

C Iacobellis1, T Agrò, R Aldegheri.   

Abstract

This paper reports the results of treating 35 humeral shaft fractures with antegrade nailing in patients between the ages of 25 and 92 (mean 64.5): 14 patients were aged between 25 and 59, and 21 between 66 and 92. The nail was set in place proximally with a spiral blade and distally with 1 or 2 screws. In the first 14 cases, uncannulated humeral nailing (UHN) was carried out, and in the next 21 cannulated humeral nailing (CHN). The latter technique uses a guide wire which, in cases of an error in the length of the nail, is useful in that it allows another nail to be set in place. Main outcome parameters were fracture healing, shoulder discomfort, and radial nerve recovery. The DASH functional scoring system, modified according to Beaton et al. for subjective assessment was used, and range of motion was checked with the constant score. X-rays were used to assess fracture healing time and cases of malunion. Two patients developed non-union, one caused by a UHN which was too short, and the other by a nail blocked distally by a single screw. In 7 patients, consolidation was achieved, but with varus between 3 and 8 degrees (mean 5 degrees), without aesthetic or functional damage. In 33 out of 35 patients, shoulder functionality had mean DASH score results of 21.9, whereas shoulder range of motion reached a mean constant score (CS) of 26.5 (78.8%) with respect to the opposite shoulder. In 5 cases of stiffness, the UHN turned out to be insufficiently buried. Results improved with the CHN. Much better results were seen in the group of patients aged between 25 and 59 (mean age 43), but worse in older ones (66-92 years, mean age 78). Radial nerve palsy after surgery occurred in 2 cases, and the nerve was immediately examined. It did not appear to be trapped in the fracture in either case, and recovery was complete 6 months later. CHN appears to be a valid solution, both in younger patients, thanks to excellent results, and in older ones, who have fewer functional requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922194     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-011-0166-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  34 in total

1.  Locked nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Experience in Edinburgh over a two-year period.

Authors:  C M Robinson; K M Bell; C M Court-Brown; M M McQueen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-07

2.  The risk of injury to neurovascular structures from distal locking screws of the Unreamed Humeral Nail (UHN): a cadaveric study.

Authors:  M Noger; M C Berli; J H D Fasel; P J Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  A new modular nail for the diaphyseal fractures of the humerus.

Authors:  Christos Garnavos; Nikolaos Lasanianos; Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Christina Arnaoutoglou; Vasiliki Papathanasopoulou; Theodoros Xenakis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Peter P Koch; Dominique F L Gross; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces.

Authors:  J B Zagorski; L L Latta; G A Zych; A R Finnieston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Closed interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures with the Russell-Taylor nail.

Authors:  M A Cox; M Dolan; K Synnott; J P McElwain
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures: the Oxford experience 1991 to 1994.

Authors:  T E Hems; T P Bhullar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 8.  Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  David J Heineman; Rudolf W Poolman; Sean E Nork; Kees-Jan Ponsen; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  PHN for treatment of proximal humerus fractures: evaluation of 80 cases.

Authors:  Claudio Iacobellis; Damiano Serafini; Roberto Aldegheri
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-05-26

10.  Telegraph antegrade nailing in the treatment of humeral fractures with rotator interval split technique.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Fabio Cautiero; Luigi Vernaglia Lombardi; Valeria Visconti
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Andre R Spiguel; Robert J Steffner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

2.  HUMeral shaft fractures: measuring recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study.

Authors:  Kiran C Mahabier; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Hugo W Bolhuis; P Koen Bos; Maarten Wga Bronkhorst; Milko M M Bruijninckx; Jeroen De Haan; Axel R Deenik; Boudewijn J Dwars; Martin G Eversdijk; J Carel Goslings; Robert Haverlag; Martin J Heetveld; Albert J H Kerver; Karel A Kolkman; Peter A Leenhouts; Sven A G Meylaerts; Ron Onstenk; Martijn Poeze; Rudolf W Poolman; Bas J Punt; W Herbert Roerdink; Gert R Roukema; Jan Bernard Sintenie; Nicolaj M R Soesman; Andras K F Tanka; Edgar J T Ten Holder; Maarten Van der Elst; Frank H W M Van der Heijden; Frits M Van der Linden; Peer Van der Zwaal; Jan P Van Dijk; Hans-Peter W Van Jonbergen; Egbert J M M Verleisdonk; Jos P A M Vroemen; Marco Waleboer; Philippe Wittich; Wietse P Zuidema; Suzanne Polinder; Michael H J Verhofstad; Dennis Den Hartog
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.