BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies comparing pentostatin (P), cyclophosphamide (C), and rituximab (R) (PCR) to fludarabine plus C+R (FCR) suggest similar efficacy with fewer infectious complications with PCR. We compared FCR and PCR in previously-untreated or minimally-treated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). TREATMENT: FCR (F 20 mg/m(2) Days 1-5, C 600 mg/m(2) Day 1, R 375 mg/m(2) Day 1) (28-day cycles) or PCR (P 4 mg/m(2) Day 1, C 600 mg/m(2) Day 1, R 375 mg/m(2) Day 1) (21-day cycles). Dose 1 of R: 100 mg/m(2) was given on Day 8 Cycle 1 and the remainder on Day 9; in subsequent cycles the entire dose was given on Day 1. RESULTS:Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to each group (N = 184). Groups were balanced; ~20% had received prior chemotherapy. The infection rate (FCR/PCR) was 31%/36%, the infective event rate was 38%/45%; 30 (35%)/37 (44%) patients were hospitalized; total hospitalization days was 271/404. 12 (14%)/6 (7%) patients achieved complete remissions (CR); the overall response rate (ORR) including CR+nodular PR (nPR)+PR was 59%/49%. Grade 3-4 treatment related AEs: neutropenia (69%/57%), leukopenia (34%/17%), thrombocytopenia (13%/6%). Grade 3-4 infections: febrile neutropenia (8%/6%), fever (2%/6%), infection (1%/3%), urinary tract infection (1%/0%), pneumonia (3%/1%), and sepsis (1%/2%); 5 deaths (1 FCR/4 PCR) were treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS:PCR and FCR have significant activity in CLL and can be given safely in the community setting despite significant toxicity. ORRs were lower than expected; the CR rate was higher (NS) with FCR. This trial did not demonstrate a lower infection rate with PCR.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies comparing pentostatin (P), cyclophosphamide (C), and rituximab (R) (PCR) to fludarabine plus C+R (FCR) suggest similar efficacy with fewer infectious complications with PCR. We compared FCR and PCR in previously-untreated or minimally-treated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). TREATMENT: FCR (F 20 mg/m(2) Days 1-5, C 600 mg/m(2) Day 1, R 375 mg/m(2) Day 1) (28-day cycles) or PCR (P 4 mg/m(2) Day 1, C 600 mg/m(2) Day 1, R 375 mg/m(2) Day 1) (21-day cycles). Dose 1 of R: 100 mg/m(2) was given on Day 8 Cycle 1 and the remainder on Day 9; in subsequent cycles the entire dose was given on Day 1. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to each group (N = 184). Groups were balanced; ~20% had received prior chemotherapy. The infection rate (FCR/PCR) was 31%/36%, the infective event rate was 38%/45%; 30 (35%)/37 (44%) patients were hospitalized; total hospitalization days was 271/404. 12 (14%)/6 (7%) patients achieved complete remissions (CR); the overall response rate (ORR) including CR+nodular PR (nPR)+PR was 59%/49%. Grade 3-4 treatment related AEs: neutropenia (69%/57%), leukopenia (34%/17%), thrombocytopenia (13%/6%). Grade 3-4 infections: febrile neutropenia (8%/6%), fever (2%/6%), infection (1%/3%), urinary tract infection (1%/0%), pneumonia (3%/1%), and sepsis (1%/2%); 5 deaths (1 FCR/4 PCR) were treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: PCR and FCR have significant activity in CLL and can be given safely in the community setting despite significant toxicity. ORRs were lower than expected; the CR rate was higher (NS) with FCR. This trial did not demonstrate a lower infection rate with PCR.
Authors: Neil E Kay; Susan M Geyer; Timothy G Call; Tait D Shanafelt; Clive S Zent; Diane F Jelinek; Renee Tschumper; Nancy D Bone; Gordon W Dewald; Thomas S Lin; Nyla A Heerema; Lisa Smith; Michael R Grever; John C Byrd Journal: Blood Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael J Keating; Susan O'Brien; Maher Albitar; Susan Lerner; William Plunkett; Francis Giles; Michael Andreeff; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Deborah Thomas; Charles Koller; William Wierda; Michelle A Detry; Alice Lynn; Hagop Kantarjian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D Huhn; C von Schilling; M Wilhelm; A D Ho; M Hallek; R Kuse; W Knauf; U Riedel; A Hinke; S Srock; S Serke; C Peschel; B Emmerich Journal: Blood Date: 2001-09-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A D Ho; J Thaler; P Stryckmans; B Coiffier; M Luciani; P Sonneveld; K Lechner; S Rodenhuis; M E Peetermans; F deCataldo Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1990-09-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: K R Rai; B L Peterson; F R Appelbaum; J Kolitz; L Elias; L Shepherd; J Hines; G A Threatte; R A Larson; B D Cheson; C A Schiffer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark A Weiss; Peter G Maslak; Joseph G Jurcic; David A Scheinberg; Timothy B Aliff; Nicole Lamanna; Stanley R Frankel; Steven E Kossman; Denise Horgan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John C Byrd; Kanti Rai; Bercedis L Peterson; Frederick R Appelbaum; Vicki A Morrison; Jonathan E Kolitz; Lois Shepherd; John D Hines; Charles A Schiffer; Richard A Larson Journal: Blood Date: 2004-05-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Valentin Goede; Paula Cramer; Raymonde Busch; Manuela Bergmann; Martina Stauch; Georg Hopfinger; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Hartmut Döhner; Anne Westermann; Clemens M Wendtner; Barbara Eichhorst; Michael Hallek Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Maria Winqvist; Anna Asklid; P O Andersson; Karin Karlsson; Claes Karlsson; Birgitta Lauri; Jeanette Lundin; Mattias Mattsson; Stefan Norin; Anna Sandstedt; Lotta Hansson; Anders Österborg Journal: Haematologica Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 9.941