BACKGROUND: Incarceration is associated with poor health and high costs. Given the dramatic growth in the criminal justice system's population and associated expenses, inclusion of questions related to incarceration in national health data sets could provide essential data to researchers, clinicians and policy-makers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a representative sample of publically available national health data sets for their ability to be used to study the health of currently or formerly incarcerated persons and to identify opportunities to improve criminal justice questions in health data sets. DESIGN & APPROACH: We reviewed the 36 data sets from the Society of General Internal Medicine Dataset Compendium related to individual health. Through content analysis using incarceration-related keywords, we identified data sets that could be used to study currently or formerly incarcerated persons, and we identified opportunities to improve the availability of relevant data. KEY RESULTS: While 12 (33%) data sets returned keyword matches, none could be used to study incarcerated persons. Three (8%) could be used to study the health of formerly incarcerated individuals, but only one data set included multiple questions such as length of incarceration and age at incarceration. Missed opportunities included: (1) data sets that included current prisoners but did not record their status (10, 28%); (2) data sets that asked questions related to incarceration but did not specifically record a subject's status as formerly incarcerated (8, 22%); and (3) longitudinal studies that dropped and/or failed to record persons who became incarcerated during the study (8, 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Few health data sets can be used to evaluate the association between incarceration and health. Three types of changes to existing national health data sets could substantially expand the available data, including: recording incarceration status for study participants who are incarcerated; recording subjects' history of incarceration when this data is already being collected; and expanding incarceration-related questions in studies that already record incarceration history.
BACKGROUND: Incarceration is associated with poor health and high costs. Given the dramatic growth in the criminal justice system's population and associated expenses, inclusion of questions related to incarceration in national health data sets could provide essential data to researchers, clinicians and policy-makers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a representative sample of publically available national health data sets for their ability to be used to study the health of currently or formerly incarcerated persons and to identify opportunities to improve criminal justice questions in health data sets. DESIGN & APPROACH: We reviewed the 36 data sets from the Society of General Internal Medicine Dataset Compendium related to individual health. Through content analysis using incarceration-related keywords, we identified data sets that could be used to study currently or formerly incarcerated persons, and we identified opportunities to improve the availability of relevant data. KEY RESULTS: While 12 (33%) data sets returned keyword matches, none could be used to study incarcerated persons. Three (8%) could be used to study the health of formerly incarcerated individuals, but only one data set included multiple questions such as length of incarceration and age at incarceration. Missed opportunities included: (1) data sets that included current prisoners but did not record their status (10, 28%); (2) data sets that asked questions related to incarceration but did not specifically record a subject's status as formerly incarcerated (8, 22%); and (3) longitudinal studies that dropped and/or failed to record persons who became incarcerated during the study (8, 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Few health data sets can be used to evaluate the association between incarceration and health. Three types of changes to existing national health data sets could substantially expand the available data, including: recording incarceration status for study participants who are incarcerated; recording subjects' history of incarceration when this data is already being collected; and expanding incarceration-related questions in studies that already record incarceration history.
Authors: L P Fried; N O Borhani; P Enright; C D Furberg; J M Gardin; R A Kronmal; L H Kuller; T A Manolio; M B Mittelmark; A Newman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Alexander K Smith; John Z Ayanian; Kenneth E Covinsky; Bruce E Landon; Ellen P McCarthy; Christina C Wee; Michael A Steinman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-02-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brie A Williams; James S Goodwin; Jacques Baillargeon; Cyrus Ahalt; Louise C Walter Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ingrid A Binswanger; Laura M Maruschak; Shane R Mueller; Marc F Stern; Stuart A Kinner Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019 May/Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Helen Cole; Hayley S Thompson; Marilyn White; Ruth Browne; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Scott Braithwaite; Kevin Fiscella; Carla Boutin-Foster; Joseph Ravenell Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cyrus Ahalt; Robert L Trestman; Josiah D Rich; Robert B Greifinger; Brie A Williams Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joseph W Frank; Jeffrey A Linder; William C Becker; David A Fiellin; Emily A Wang Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 5.128