| Literature DB >> 21921981 |
Zoe Tzu-Yi Chen1, I-Jong Wang, Ya-Tang Liao, Yung-Feng Shih, Luke Long-Kuang Lin.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in steroidogenesis enzyme genes, serum levels of sex steroids, and high myopia in Taiwanese male and female populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21921981 PMCID: PMC3171499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Figure 1Major pathways in sex steroid biosynthesis (progestogens in orange boxes, estrogens in yellow boxes, and androgens in blue boxes). CYP11A1=cholesterol desmolase, CYP17A1=17 alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase, HSD3B=3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, HSD17B1=17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1, CYP19A1=aromatase, SRD5A2=steroid-5-alpha-reductase, alpha polypeptide 2.
Baseline characteristics
| Age (years) | 18.8±0.8 | 19.4±2.4 | <0.001 |
| Male (%) | 148 (51.0) | 147 (51.4) | 0.930 |
| SEM of right eye (D) | −8.2±1.7 | −0.8±0.8 | <0.001 |
| SEM of left eye (D) | −8.0±1.8 | −0.7±0.8 | <0.001 |
| Progesterone (ng/ml) | 3.7±3.8 | 5.2±6.6 | 0.008 |
| Estradiol (pg/ml) | 34.8±22.1 | 35.1±30.5 | 0.895 |
| Testosterone (ng/ml) | 4.1±2.8 | 3.4±2.5 | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | 18.8±1.0 | 19.2±2.1 | 0.019 |
| SEM of right eye (D) | −8.3±1.6 | −0.9±0.8 | <0.001 |
| SEM of left eye (D) | −8.1±1.5 | −0.8±0.8 | <0.001 |
| Progesterone (ng/ml) | 2.6±1.7 | 3.9±4.0 | <0.001 |
| Estradiol (pg/ml) | 26.6±11.9 | 20.9±15.2 | <0.001 |
| Testosterone (ng/ml) | 6.3±2.1 | 5.4±1.5 | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | 18.8±0.6 | 19.6±2.6 | <0.001 |
| SEM of right eye (D) | −8.0±1.7 | −0.7±0.8 | <0.001 |
| SEM of left eye (D) | −7.9±2.1 | −0.7±0.7 | <0.001 |
| Progesterone (ng/ml) | 4.8±4.9 | 6.6±8.4 | 0.031 |
| Estradiol (pg/ml) | 43.4±26.7 | 50.2±35.4 | 0.074 |
| Testosterone (ng/ml) | 1.9±1.3 | 1.2±0.9 | <0.001 |
Data are reported as mean±standard deviation. SE=spherical equivalent; D=diopter.
Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in sex steroidogenesis enzyme genes and high myopia risk and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test.
| rs743572 | 1.000 | 0.608 | 0.351 | |||||
| GG | 82 | 92 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| GA | 147 | 137 | 1.20 (0.83–1.76) | 1.33 (0.90–1.95) | ||||
| AA | 54 | 51 | 1.19 (0.73–1.93) | 1.26 (0.77–2.06) | ||||
| rs6203 | 0.590 | 0.939 | 0.887 | |||||
| TT | 115 | 113 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| TC | 138 | 133 | 1.02 (0.72–1.45) | 1.00 (0.70–1.44) | ||||
| CC | 30 | 34 | 0.87 (0.50–1.51) | 0.89 (0.50–1.57) | ||||
| rs1047303 | 0.620 | 0.922 | 0.808 | |||||
| AA | 236 | 239 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| AC | 46 | 40 | 1.16 (0.74–1.85) | 1.18 (0.73–1.89) | ||||
| CC | 1 | 1 | 1.01 (0.06–16.29) | 0.82 (0.05–13.34) | ||||
| rs605059 | 0.359 | 0.809 | 0.821 | |||||
| GG | 87 | 76 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| GA | 140 | 147 | 0.83 (0.57–1.22) | 0.88 (0.60–1.31) | ||||
| AA | 56 | 57 | 0.86 (0.53–1.39) | 0.89 (0.55–1.45) | ||||
| rs523349 | 0.386 | 0.776 | 0.596 | |||||
| GG | 97 | 99 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| GC | 141 | 129 | 1.12 (0.77–1.61) | 1.17 (0.81–1.71) | ||||
| CC | 45 | 52 | 0.88 (0.54–1.44) | 0.91 (0.55–1.49) | ||||
| rs10046 | 0.983 | 0.799 | 0.678 | |||||
| AA | 80 | 87 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| AG | 151 | 138 | 1.19 (0.81–1.74) | 1.22 (0.83–1.80) | ||||
| GG | 52 | 55 | 1.03 (0.63–1.67) | 1.22 (0.66–1.84) | ||||
SNP=single nucleotide polymorphism; HWE=Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test (conducted among controls); OR=odds ratio. *Adjusted for sex and age.
Pairwise stratified analysis of synergistic genotypic association.
| AA | TT | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.833 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.113 | ||
| TC | 0.96 (0.39–2.37) | 0.929 | 2.88 (1.05–7.88) | 0.040 | |||
| CC | 1.40 (0.39–5.08) | 0.609 | 1.44 (0.31–6.62) | 0.639 | |||
| AG | TT | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.007 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.015 | ||
| TC | 2.38 (1.17–4.83) | 0.017 | 0.40 (0.19–0.81) | 0.011 | |||
| CC | 0.42 (0.12–1.46) | 0.173 | 0.26 (0.08–0.88) | 0.030 | |||
| GG | TT | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.207 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.829 | ||
| TC | 0.60 (0.18–2.00) | 0.406 | 0.71 (0.23–2.15) | 0.541 | |||
| CC | 3.00 (0.48–18.60) | 0.238 | - | ||||
| GG | AA | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.821 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.609 | ||
| AC | 0.73 (0.27–1.97) | 0.821 | 0.71 (0.19–2.67) | 0.609 | |||
| CC | - | - | - | - | |||
| GA | AA | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.013 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.253 | ||
| AC | 4.32 (1.37–13.61) | 0.013 | 0.57 (0.21–1.50) | 0.253 | |||
| CC | - | - | - | - | |||
| AA | AA | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.391 | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.835 | ||
| AC | 3.38 (0.59–19.21) | 0.391 | 1.19 (0.24–5.84) | 0.835 | |||
| CC | - | - | - | - | |||
SNP2=rs6203 (HSD3B1); SNP3=rs1047303 (HSD3B1); SNP4=rs605059 (HSD17B1); SNP6=rs10046 (CYP19A1). aSpecific p-value. bGlobal p-value.
Summary of multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) analysis.
| 6 | 46.0 | 0.900 | 3/10 | 1.000 |
| 2, 6 | 50.6 | 0.424 | 7/10 | 0.429 |
| 2, 6. 7 | 57.5 | 0.019 | 10/10 | 0.070 |
| 1, 2, 4, 6 | 46.6 | 0.833 | 5/10 | 0836 |
Factors: 1. SNP1: rs743572 (CYP17A1); 2. SNP2: rs6203 (HSD3B1); 3. SNP3: rs1047303 (HSD3B1); 4. SNP4: rs605059 (HSD17B1); 5. SNP5: rs523349 (SRD5A2); 6. SNP6: rs10046 (CYP19A1); 7. Gender. MDR searches through all possible interaction combinations among independent variables (single factor to four-factor interaction models in this study) and reports a combination that provide the best fitness in each model. aEmpirical p-values were calculated by permutation analysis.
ANOVA for sex hormone levels among study population, including gene-sex interaction.
| Age | 0.12 | 0.727 | 1.17 | 0.280 | 0.10 | 0.752 |
| Sex | 14.64 | <0.001 | 127.09 | <0.001 | 28.80 | <0.001 |
| 0.20 | 0.820 | 0.93 | 0.339 | 1.63 | 0.198 | |
| 0.30 | 0.743 | 1.26 | 0.284 | 1.59 | 0.206 | |
| 0.00 | 0.996 | 0.77 | 0.461 | 0.67 | 0.512 | |
| 0.23 | 0.796 | 0.85 | 0.428 | 0.57 | 0.566 | |
| 0.30 | 0.741 | 0.66 | 0.517 | 0.51 | 0.603 | |
| 0.25 | 0.783 | 0.24 | 0.786 | 0.23 | 0.795 | |
| 0.55 | 0.580 | 1.62 | 0.199 | 1.25 | 0.782 | |
| 0.16 | 0.856 | 0.60 | 0.547 | 0.64 | 0.526 | |
| 0.35 | 0.555 | 1.01 | 0.315 | 1.08 | 0.298 | |
| 1.50 | 0.225 | 3.38 | 0.035 | 3.09 | 0.046 | |
| 0.10 | 0.904 | 0.57 | 0.568 | 0.47 | 0.624 | |
| 0.45 | 0.640 | 1.14 | 0.320 | 1.14 | 0.320 | |
F=The effect of an independent variable on hormone levels after adjustment for all other independent variables.
Genotypes and sex hormone levels among male subjects
| GG (n=76) | 3.12 | 2.01 | 24.27 | 14.44 | 6.10 | 1.80 |
| GA (n=156) | 3.45 | 3.88 | 24.34 | 14.19 | 5.75 | 1.87 |
| AA (n=57) | 2.99 | 1.69 | 21.55 | 12.48 | 5.75 | 2.16 |
| p-value | 0.494 | 0.358 | 0.438 | |||
| TT (n=120) | 3.48 | 4.19 | 23.49 | 14.38 | 5.93 | 1.95 |
| TC (n=133) | 3.04 | 2.09 | 24.03 | 13.93 | 5.74 | 1.89 |
| CC (n=36) | 3.44 | 1.92 | 23.76 | 12.72 | 5.94 | 1.86 |
| p-value | 0.483 | 0.967 | 0.684 | |||
| AA (n=239) | 3.37 | 3.36 | 23.86 | 14.18 | 5.89 | 1.84 |
| AC (n=48) | 2.75 | 1.49 | 23.00 | 12.86 | 5.68 | 2.24 |
| CC (n=2) | 3.97 | 3.01 | 32.61 | 6.85 | 4.34 | 0.54 |
| p-value | 0.454 | 0.653 | 0.414 | |||
| GG (n=83) | 2.77 | 1.50 | 20.50 | 11.08 | 5.67 | 1.72 |
| GA (n=151) | 3.42 | 2.88 | 24.80 | 14.21 | 5.92 | 2.09 |
| AA (n=55) | 3.60 | 5.00 | 25.88 | 16.24 | 5.91 | 1.64 |
| p-value | 0.214 | 0.035 | 0.600 | |||
| GG (n=110) | 2.92 | 1.88 | 21.63 | 11.15 | 5.91 | 1.93 |
| GC (n=138) | 3.58 | 4.12 | 25.63 | 15.84 | 5.84 | 1.96 |
| CC (n=41) | 3.17 | 1.38 | 23.31 | 13.21 | 4.70 | 1.71 |
| p-value | 0.217 | 0.066 | 0.866 | |||
| AA (n=91) | 2.86 | 1.42 | 21.35 | 11.51 | 5.88 | 1.88 |
| AG (n=146) | 3.52 | 3.83 | 25.50 | 14.50 | 5.85 | 1.90 |
| GG (n=52) | 3.29 | 3.07 | 23.15 | 15.64 | 5.77 | 2.00 |
| p-value | 0.249 | 0.064 | 0.960 | |||
p-values were adjusted by age.
Genotypes and sex hormone levels among female subjects.
| GG (n=98) | 5.33 | 7.13 | 42.98 | 28.69 | 1.41 | 0.86 |
| GA (n=128) | 5.98 | 7.30 | 50.53 | 34.26 | 1.64 | 1.35 |
| AA (n=48) | 5.71 | 5.22 | 44.39 | 28.08 | 1.67 | 1.07 |
| p-value | 0.780 | 0.171 | 0.257 | |||
| TT (n=108) | 5.70 | 7.40 | 44.16 | 30.31 | 1.71 | 1.38 |
| TC (n=138) | 5.59 | 6.17 | 48.74 | 33.11 | 1.48 | 0.98 |
| CC (n=28) | 6.26 | 8.43 | 46.95 | 27.11 | 1.41 | 0.85 |
| p-value | 0.799 | 0.386 | 0.361 | |||
| AA (n=236) | 5.66 | 6.80 | 47.27 | 30.56 | 1.58 | 1.14 |
| AC (n=38) | 5.97 | 7.63 | 43.57 | 36.64 | 1.43 | 1.21 |
| p-value | 0.666 | 0.569 | 0.484 | |||
| GG (n=80) | 6.34 | 6.65 | 50.64 | 34.79 | 1.83 | 1.44 |
| GA (n=136) | 5.54 | 7.27 | 47.43 | 31.87 | 1.44 | 0.94 |
| AA (n=58) | 5.18 | 6.42 | 39.82 | 23.97 | 1.48 | 1.10 |
| p-value | 0.425 | 0.114 | 0.027 | |||
| GG (n=86) | 5.53 | 7.16 | 48.03 | 30.78 | 1.52 | 1.02 |
| GC (n=132) | 5.94 | 7.48 | 47.59 | 34.06 | 1.61 | 1.35 |
| CC (n=56) | 5.41 | 4.90 | 42.83 | 25.56 | 1.49 | 0.78 |
| p-value | 0.977 | 0.612 | 0.846 | |||
| AA (n=76) | 6.13 | 8.02 | 50.83 | 36.93 | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| AG (n=143) | 5.37 | 6.25 | 45.34 | 29.38 | 1.60 | 1.16 |
| GG (n=55) | 5.97 | 6.95 | 44.79 | 28.19 | 1.56 | 1.32 |
| p-value | 0.843 | 0.552 | 0.546 | |||
p-values were adjusted by age.
Comparison of allele frequencies between Taiwanese and other populations.
| A | 0.427 | 0.603 | 0.729 | 0.456 | 0.625 | |
| G | 0.573 | 0.397 | 0.271 | 0.544 | 0.375 | |
| p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.498 | <0.001 | ||
| Taiwan (n=280) | CEU (n=120) | YRI (n=120) | HCB (n=90) | JPT (n=88) | ||
| C | 0.359 | 0.608 | 1.000 | 0.322 | 0.375 | |
| T | 0.641 | 0.392 | 0.000 | 0.678 | 0.625 | |
| p-value | <0.001 | <0001 | 0.369 | 0.699 | ||
| Taiwan (n=280) | CEU (n=120) | YRI (n=120) | HCB (n=90) | JPT (n=88) | ||
| A | 0.925 | 0.992 | 0.992 | 0.900 | 0.898 | |
| C | 0.075 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.100 | 0.102 | |
| p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.285 | 0.249 | ||
| Taiwan (n=280) | CEPH (n=184) | YRI (NA) | HCB (NA) | JPT (NA) | ||
| A | 0.466 | 0.730 | ||||
| G | 0.534 | 0.270 | ||||
| p-value | <0.001 | |||||
| Taiwan (n=280) | CEU (n=120) | YRI (n=120) | HCB (n=90) | JPT (n=86) | ||
| C | 0.416 | 0.808 | 0.775 | 0.522 | 0.640 | |
| G | 0.584 | 0.192 | 0.225 | 0.478 | 0.360 | |
| | p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.013 | <0.001 | |
| Taiwan (n=280) | CEU (n=110) | YRI (n=120) | HCB (n=90) | JPT (n=90) | ||
| C | 0.557 | 0.445 | 0.825 | 0.411 | 0.578 | |
| T | 0.443 | 0.555 | 0.175 | 0.589 | 0.422 | |
| p-value | 0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.627 | ||
CEU: Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry from the CEPH collection; YRI: Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria; HCB: Han Chinese in Beijing, China; JPT: Japanese in Tokyo, Japan; CEPH: Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Human pedigrees; NA: not available. p-values were calculated by pairwise comparisons of allele frequencies between the Taiwanese population and other populations.