BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between treatment time and outcomes after intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. However, the temporal profile of ischemia may vary according to the level of occlusion, and it is likely that more proximal occlusions have a more variable temporal course than their distal counterparts. We sought to establish how time influences outcomes in anterior circulation proximal arterial occlusions. METHODS: All patients from the MERCI/Multi MERCI trials with intracranial internal carotid artery and/or middle cerebral artery (M1-M2 segments) occlusions who were successfully revascularized were included in univariate/multivariate analyses to define the predictors of independent functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and mortality at 90 days. The effect of time to reperfusion on outcomes was calculated after adjustment for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and glucose levels. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients presenting with internal carotid artery/M1/M2 occlusions were revascularized. There was no definite association between time (to treatment or reperfusion) and outcomes in the unadjusted analysis. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and age were independent predictors of independent outcome and mortality. High glucose demonstrated a strong trend toward worse outcomes. After adjustment for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and glucose, there was a strong trend toward fewer independent outcomes with later reperfusion times. Notably, 40% of the patients reperfused at ≥6.9 hours achieved independent functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Time (to treatment or reperfusion) is only one of the many variables that may impact outcome in proximal arterial occlusions strokes. Reperfusion therapies should be started promptly, but our findings also suggest that stroke patients presenting at later time points may still benefit.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between treatment time and outcomes after intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. However, the temporal profile of ischemia may vary according to the level of occlusion, and it is likely that more proximal occlusions have a more variable temporal course than their distal counterparts. We sought to establish how time influences outcomes in anterior circulation proximal arterial occlusions. METHODS: All patients from the MERCI/Multi MERCI trials with intracranial internal carotid artery and/or middle cerebral artery (M1-M2 segments) occlusions who were successfully revascularized were included in univariate/multivariate analyses to define the predictors of independent functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and mortality at 90 days. The effect of time to reperfusion on outcomes was calculated after adjustment for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and glucose levels. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients presenting with internal carotid artery/M1/M2 occlusions were revascularized. There was no definite association between time (to treatment or reperfusion) and outcomes in the unadjusted analysis. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and age were independent predictors of independent outcome and mortality. High glucose demonstrated a strong trend toward worse outcomes. After adjustment for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and glucose, there was a strong trend toward fewer independent outcomes with later reperfusion times. Notably, 40% of the patients reperfused at ≥6.9 hours achieved independent functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Time (to treatment or reperfusion) is only one of the many variables that may impact outcome in proximal arterial occlusions strokes. Reperfusion therapies should be started promptly, but our findings also suggest that strokepatients presenting at later time points may still benefit.
Authors: Marc A Lazzaro; Roberta L Novakovic; Andrei V Alexandrov; Ziad Darkhabani; Randall C Edgell; Joey English; Donald Frei; Dara G Jamieson; Vallabh Janardhan; Nazli Janjua; Rashid M Janjua; Irene Katzan; Pooja Khatri; Jawad F Kirmani; David S Liebeskind; Italo Linfante; Thanh N Nguyen; Jeffrey L Saver; Lori Shutter; Andrew Xavier; Dileep Yavagal; Osama O Zaidat Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Pooja Khatri; Sharon D Yeatts; Mikael Mazighi; Joseph P Broderick; David S Liebeskind; Andrew M Demchuk; Pierre Amarenco; Janice Carrozzella; Judith Spilker; Lydia D Foster; Mayank Goyal; Michael D Hill; Yuko Y Palesch; Edward C Jauch; E Clarke Haley; Achala Vagal; Thomas A Tomsick Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Sunil A Sheth; Reza Jahan; Jan Gralla; Vitor M Pereira; Raul G Nogueira; Elad I Levy; Osama O Zaidat; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Amrou Sarraj; Karen Albright; Andrew D Barreto; Amelia K Boehme; Clark W Sitton; Jeanie Choi; Steven L Lutzker; Chung-Huan J Sun; Wafi Bibars; Claude B Nguyen; Osman Mir; Farhaan Vahidy; Tzu-Ching Wu; George A Lopez; Nicole R Gonzales; Randall Edgell; Sheryl Martin-Schild; Hen Hallevi; Peng Roc Chen; Mark Dannenbaum; Jeffrey L Saver; David S Liebeskind; Raul G Nogueira; Rishi Gupta; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 7.914