| Literature DB >> 21921200 |
Misato Kaso1, Keiko Miyamoto, Emi Koyama, Takeo Nakayama.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate breastfeeding information in midwifery textbooks. Evaluation standards were developed in order to perform content analysis. A 3-round Delphi method using a panel of 32 midwives resulted in 36 evaluation items from the original 38 draft items based on 4 major international guidelines and statements on breastfeeding. Subsequently, breastfeeding descriptions in 4 midwifery textbooks most frequently used in Japan were examined using a 4-point scale (A, accurate and sufficient description; B, accurate but insufficient description; C, no description; and D, inaccurate or inconsistent description). Among the evaluation items, 40% were rated as A, 25% as C, 21% as B, and 15% as D across the 4 textbooks. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of breastfeeding information in these textbooks was found to be inaccurate, inconsistent, or insufficient in content.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21921200 DOI: 10.1177/0890334411409751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Lact ISSN: 0890-3344 Impact factor: 2.219