Literature DB >> 21920693

Patient perspectives regarding communication about prognosis and end-of-life issues: how can it be optimised?

Adam Walczak1, Phyllis N Butow, Patricia M Davidson, Frances A Bellemore, Martin H N Tattersall, Josephine M Clayton, Jane Young, Benjamin Mazer, Susan Ladwig, Ronald M Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' perspectives across two cultures (Australia and USA) regarding communication about prognosis and end-of-life care issues and to consider the ways in which these discussions can be optimised.
METHODS: Fifteen Australian and 11 US patients completed individual semi-structured qualitative interviews. A further 8 US patients participated in a focus group. Interviews and focus group recordings were transcribed verbatim and interpreted using thematic text analysis with an inductive, data-driven approach.
RESULTS: Global themes identified included readiness for and outcomes of discussions of prognosis and end-of-life issues. Contributing to readiness were sub themes including patients' adjustment to and acceptance of their condition (together with seven factors promoting this), doctor and patient communication skills, mutual understandings and therapeutic relationship elements. Outcomes included sub themes of achievement of control and ability to move on. A model of the relationships between these factors, emergent cross cultural differences, and how factors may help to optimise these discussions are presented.
CONCLUSION: Identified optimising factors illustrate Australian and US patients' perspectives regarding how prognosis and end-of-life issues can be discussed with minimised negative impact. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Recognition of factors promoting adjustment, acceptance and readiness and use of the communication skills and therapeutic relationship elements identified may assist in optimising discussions and help patients plan care, achieve more control of their situation and enjoy an optimal quality-of-life.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21920693     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  16 in total

1.  Surgeons' Perspectives on Avoiding Nonbeneficial Treatments in Seriously Ill Older Patients with Surgical Emergencies: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Christy E Cauley; Susan D Block; Luca A Koritsanszky; Jonathon D Gass; Julia L Frydman; Suliat M Nurudeen; Rachelle E Bernacki; Zara Cooper
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Exploring symptom meaning: perspectives of palliative care physicians.

Authors:  Celina F Estacio; Phyllis N Butow; Melanie R Lovell; Skye T Dong; Josephine M Clayton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Understanding patient needs without understanding the patient: the need for complementary use of professional interpreters in end-of-life care.

Authors:  Demi Krystallidou; Ignaas Devisch; Dominique Van de Velde; Peter Pype
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

4.  Engaging Terminally Ill Patients in End of Life Talk: How Experienced Palliative Medicine Doctors Navigate the Dilemma of Promoting Discussions about Dying.

Authors:  Marco Pino; Ruth Parry; Victoria Land; Christina Faull; Luke Feathers; Jane Seymour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Is it acceptable to video-record palliative care consultations for research and training purposes? A qualitative interview study exploring the views of hospice patients, carers and clinical staff.

Authors:  Marco Pino; Ruth Parry; Luke Feathers; Christina Faull
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 6.  Perspectives of older people living in long-term care facilities and of their family members toward advance care planning discussions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Veronica Mignani; Francesca Ingravallo; Elena Mariani; Rabih Chattat
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  The facilitating role of chemotherapy in the palliative phase of cancer: qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Hilde M Buiting; Wim Terpstra; Floriske Dalhuisen; Nicolette Gunnink-Boonstra; Gabe S Sonke; Govert den Hartogh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discussing prognosis and end-of-life care in the final year of life: a randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led communication support programme for patients and caregivers.

Authors:  Adam Walczak; Phyllis N Butow; Josephine M Clayton; Martin H N Tattersall; Patricia M Davidson; Jane Young; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Doctors' insights into the patient perspective: a qualitative study in the field of chronic pain.

Authors:  Claudia Zanini; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Fabiola Atzeni; Manuela Di Franco; Sara Rubinelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  What Makes a Good Palliative Care Physician? A Qualitative Study about the Patient's Expectations and Needs when Being Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit.

Authors:  Eva K Masel; Anna Kitta; Patrick Huber; Tamara Rumpold; Matthias Unseld; Sophie Schur; Edit Porpaczy; Herbert H Watzke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.