Literature DB >> 21920645

Facts first, then reaction--expectant fathers' experiences of an ultrasound screening identifying soft markers.

Annika Åhman1, Peter Lindgren, Anna Sarkadi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: expectant fathers often attend pregnancy ultrasound but their needs are poorly examined, especially in connection with adverse findings.
OBJECTIVE: to explore men's expectations of routine ultrasound and experiences when soft markers were discovered. DESIGN/
SETTING: a qualitative study at Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden where semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 expectant fathers 6-12 weeks after the discovery of a soft marker at the routine ultrasound scan.
FINDINGS: five major themes emerged: (1) 'immediate reaction: frustration and thoughts about consequences', (2) 'need for facts to gain control', (3) 'concern about the partner', (4) 'in retrospect: almost okay but routines need changing' and (5) 'amniocenteses or not: a joint decision with several considerations'. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTISE: these findings contribute important knowledge about men's needs related to pregnancy ultrasound with unexpected findings, and their role in decision-making concerning fetal diagnostics. Our results show that men enter a role of a kind of fact manager and have both a psychological need as well as the capacity to perceive important information during the process following the detection of a soft marker in the fetus. Practitioners conducting pregnancy ultrasound should therefore have relevant knowledge to be able to provide immediate information about soft markers, including risk assessment for chromosomal defects. In addition to this, written information about soft markers should be available to expecting parents in this situation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21920645     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  10 in total

1.  Swedish University Students' Opinion Regarding Information About Soft Markers.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Peter Lindgren; Karin Nordin; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Sonographers' communication in obstetrics: Challenges to their professional role and practice in Australia.

Authors:  Samantha Thomas; Kate O'Loughlin; Jillian Clarke
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-11-02

3.  Female and male perspectives on male partner roles in expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Sarah Jurgensmeyer; Sarah Walterman; Andrew Wagner; Kenny Wong; Annie Bao; Sarah Stueber; Sara Spencer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Information following a diagnosis of congenital heart defect: experiences among parents to prenatally diagnosed children.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Gunnar Bergman; Ulla Melander Marttala; Barbro Wadensten; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Emotional and cognitive experiences during the time of diagnosis and decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis: a qualitative study of males presented with congenital heart defect in the fetus carried by their pregnant partner.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  First and second trimester ultrasound in pregnancy: A systematic review and metasynthesis of the views and experiences of pregnant women, partners, and health workers.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Kenneth Finlayson; Sarah Cordey; Rebekah McCrimmon; Catherine Harris; Maria Barreix; Özge Tunçalp; Soo Downe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  'It made you think twice' - an interview study of women's perception of a web-based decision aid concerning screening and diagnostic testing for fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Anna Sarkadi; Peter Lindgren; Christine Rubertsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Two sides of the same coin--an interview study of Swedish obstetricians' experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Margareta Persson; Kristina Edvardsson; Ann Lalos; Sophie Graner; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Quality of Patient Information Websites About Congenital Heart Defects: Mixed-Methods Study of Perspectives Among Individuals With Experience of a Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Ulla Melander Marttala; Barbro Wadensten; Gunnar Bergman; Ove Axelsson; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2017-09-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.