Literature DB >> 2192041

Expression and performance in transgenic pigs.

V G Pursel1, D J Bolt, K F Miller, C A Pinkert, R E Hammer, R D Palmiter, R L Brinster.   

Abstract

Recent research clearly shows that fusion genes can be microinjected into a pronucleus of an ovum and integrate into the pig genome. Animals with such fusion genes are called 'transgenic'. The percentage of injected ova that developed into transgenic pigs varied among experiments from 0.31% to 1.73%. The percentage of transgenic pigs that expressed the fusion gene ranged from 17% to 100%. Eleven different regulatory sequences have been used for fusion genes transferred into pigs. Some of these regulatory sequences directed strong gene expression, but control over level of expression was inadequate. Other regulatory sequences directed weak expression, but imparted only brief spikes of induced expression. The predominant gene coding sequences transferred were for growth-related hormones. Elevation of growth hormone (GH) in expressing transgenic pigs enhanced plasma concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), insulin, and glucose, improved feed efficiency about 15%, and markedly reduced subcutaneous fat compared to nontransgenic siblings. Growth rate was enhanced in some transgenic GH pigs but not in others, possibly due to dietary limits. The 'over-expression' of GH was detrimental to the general health of most transgenic pigs. The most prevalent problems were lethargy, lameness, and gastric ulcers. Gilts that expressed foreign GH genes were anoestrous. Boars that expressed foreign GH genes lacked libido, but their semen was fertile when used by artificial insemination. Six different fusion genes have been transmitted from transgenic founders to progeny. Most of the transgenic pigs that produced progeny transmitted the fusion gene as an autosomal dominant trait to about half of their progeny. Regulatory sequences that will permit full control of gene expression must be developed before the full potential of gene transfer in pigs can be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2192041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl        ISSN: 0449-3087


  10 in total

1.  Transgenic expression of CTLA4-Ig by fetal pig neurons for xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Caroline Martin; Martine Plat; Véronique Nerriére-Daguin; Flora Coulon; Svetlana Uzbekova; Eric Venturi; Françoise Condé; Jean-Michel Hermel; Philippe Hantraye; Laurent Tesson; Ignacio Anegon; Benoit Melchior; Marc Peschanski; Brigitte Le Mauff; Françoise Boeffard; Solène Sergent-Tanguy; Isabelle Neveu; Philippe Naveilhan; Jean-Paul Soulillou; Michel Terqui; Philippe Brachet; Bernard Vanhove
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Expression of a novel piscine growth hormone gene results in growth enhancement in transgenic tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).

Authors:  M A Rahman; R Mak; H Ayad; A Smith; N Maclean
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Genetic modifications of pigs for medicine and agriculture.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Whyte; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Genome Editing in Large Animals.

Authors:  James West; W Warren Gill
Journal:  J Equine Vet Sci       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.583

5.  Conditional induction of ovulation in mice.

Authors:  Pei Su; Joyce C Wu; Jeffrey R Sommer; A Jesse Gore; Robert M Petters; William L Miller
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Quantitative genetics of transgenic mice: components of phenotypic variation in body weights and weight gains.

Authors:  A C Clutter; D Pomp; J D Murray
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Matrix-attachment regions can impart position-independent regulation of a tissue-specific gene in transgenic mice.

Authors:  R A McKnight; A Shamay; L Sankaran; R J Wall; L Hennighausen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Gene targeting in livestock: a preview.

Authors:  A J Clark; S Burl; C Denning; P Dickinson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.145

Review 9.  Growth hormone and reproduction: a review of endocrine and autocrine/paracrine interactions.

Authors:  Kerry L Hull; Steve Harvey
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 10.  Towards progressive regulatory approaches for agricultural applications of animal biotechnology.

Authors:  Eric M Hallerman; Justin P Bredlau; Luiz Sergio A Camargo; Maria Lucia Zaidan Dagli; Margaret Karembu; Godfrey Ngure; Rhodora Romero-Aldemita; Pedro Jesús Rocha-Salavarrieta; Mark Tizard; Mark Walton; Diane Wray-Cahen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.788

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.