Literature DB >> 21920317

Repositioning of aurora B promoted by chiasmata ensures sister chromatid mono-orientation in meiosis I.

Takeshi Sakuno1, Koichi Tanaka, Silke Hauf, Yoshinori Watanabe.   

Abstract

During meiosis I, kinetochores of sister chromatids are juxtaposed or fused and mono-orient, while homologous chromosomes that are paired by chiasmata (bivalents) have to biorient. In the absence of chiasmata, biorientation of sister chromatids (univalents), which carries a risk of aneuploidy, has been occasionally detected in several species, including humans. We show in fission yeast that biorientation of fused sister kinetochores predominates during early prometaphase I. Without chiasmata, this undesirable biorientation of univalents persists and eventually evades the spindle assembly checkpoint, provoking abnormal anaphase. When univalents are connected by chiasmata or by an artificial tether, this erroneous attachment is converted to monopolar attachment and stabilized. This stabilization is apparently achieved by a chromosome configuration that brings kinetochores to the outer edge of the bivalent, while bringing Aurora B, a destabilizer of kinetochore-microtubule attachment, inward. Our results elucidate how chiasmata favor biorientation of bivalents over that of univalents at meiosis I.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21920317     DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cell        ISSN: 1534-5807            Impact factor:   12.270


  37 in total

Review 1.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Geometry and force behind kinetochore orientation: lessons from meiosis.

Authors:  Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Couples, pairs, and clusters: mechanisms and implications of centromere associations in meiosis.

Authors:  David Obeso; Roberto J Pezza; Dean Dawson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Sister chromatid segregation in meiosis II: deprotection through phosphorylation.

Authors:  Katja Wassmann
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Maternal obesity enhances oocyte chromosome abnormalities associated with aging.

Authors:  Yan Yun; Zijie Wei; Neil Hunter
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Meikin is a conserved regulator of meiosis-I-specific kinetochore function.

Authors:  Jihye Kim; Kei-ichiro Ishiguro; Aya Nambu; Bungo Akiyoshi; Shihori Yokobayashi; Ayano Kagami; Tadashi Ishiguro; Alberto M Pendas; Naoki Takeda; Yogo Sakakibara; Tomoya S Kitajima; Yuji Tanno; Takeshi Sakuno; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Differentiating the roles of microtubule-associated proteins at meiotic kinetochores during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Yasutaka Kakui; Masamitsu Sato
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  April Reynolds; Huanyu Qiao; Ye Yang; Jefferson K Chen; Neil Jackson; Kajal Biswas; J Kim Holloway; Frédéric Baudat; Bernard de Massy; Jeremy Wang; Christer Höög; Paula E Cohen; Neil Hunter
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 10.  Meiosis I: when chromosomes undergo extreme makeover.

Authors:  Matthew P Miller; Angelika Amon; Elçin Ünal
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.