Literature DB >> 21920194

Extended-use oral contraceptives and medically induced amenorrhea: attitudes, knowledge and prescribing habits of physicians.

Carrie E Frederick1, Alison Edelman, Nichole E Carlson, Kenneth D Rosenberg, Jeffrey T Jensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to determine whether geographic location, primary specialty, attitudes and knowledge influence the prescribing habits of physicians regarding extended-use oral contraceptives (OC) and medically induced amenorrhea. STUDY
DESIGN: Practice characteristics, contraceptive prescription habits, menstrual cycle physiology knowledge and attitudes about medically induced amenorrhea of Oregon obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) and family medicine physicians were assessed using either a cross-sectional postal or electronic mail survey. Attitudes were assessed using a series of Likert-style questions; multiple-choice responses were used to evaluate knowledge and prescribing habits.
RESULTS: Of the 713 physicians in the sample (email 575, paper 138), 233 returned the survey, for an overall response rate of 32.7%. Over 90% (211/233) of respondents prescribed OCs; of these, 73.9% (155/211) stated that they prescribed extended-use OCs either often (23.5%) or sometimes (50.5%). Without adjusting for other factors, physicians reporting an OBGYN specialty (odds ratio [OR] 8.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.40-18.91) or an urban practice location (OR 2.75, 95% CI: 1.42-5.30) were more likely to report prescribing extended-use OCs. However, after adjusting for other factors, attitude was the only factor which remained significantly associated with prescribing (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.41-2.42).
CONCLUSION: Physicians' attitudes regarding medically induced amenorrhea influence the use of extended-cycle OC more than any other characteristic.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21920194     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

Review 1.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

2.  Influenza vaccination of pregnant women: attitudes and behaviors of Oregon physician prenatal care providers.

Authors:  Robert F Arao; Kenneth D Rosenberg; Shannon McWeeney; Katrina Hedberg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-04

3.  Use of hormonal contraceptives to control menstrual bleeding: attitudes and practice of Brazilian gynecologists.

Authors:  María Y Makuch; Maria José D Osis; Karla Simonia de Pádua; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-11-27

4.  Cycle control with an extended-regimen oral contraceptive combining levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol that includes continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol instead of the traditional hormone-free interval.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Paloma Lobo Abascal; Jennifer Hsieh; Marie-Christine Micheletti
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-10-05

Review 5.  Extended regimen combined oral contraception: A review of evolving concepts and acceptance by women and clinicians.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Andrew M Kaunitz; Johannes Bitzer
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Medically induced amenorrhea in female astronauts.

Authors:  Varsha Jain; Virginia E Wotring
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.415

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.