OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to examine the impact of marital status on survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of EOC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for the period 1988-2006 and divided into married and unmarried groups. Statistical analysis using Student's t-test, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression proportional hazards was performed. RESULTS: In 49,777 patients with EOC, 51.2% were married and 48.8% were unmarried. White women were likely to be married compared with African Americans (52.0% vs 32.4%, p < 0.05). Younger age (63.9% vs 43.4%, p < 0.001) and early stage disease (37.5% vs 33.8%, p < 0.001) were more prominent in married patients compared with unmarried patients. Staging lymphadenectomy was performed more frequently in married than unmarried patients (39.9% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001). Overall 5-year survival was 45.0% for married patients and 33.1% for unmarried patients, p < 0.001. Married patients had a better survival compared with unmarried patients within each racial subgroup: 44.5% vs 33.3% for White women (p < 0.001), 36.9% vs 24.9% for African Americans (p < 0.001), and 53.7% vs 42.7% for others (p < 0.001), respectively. In a model that controlled for age, race, histology, stage, grade, and surgical treatment, married patients had a significantly improved survival compared with unmarried patients (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.78-0.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this epidemiologic study, the social institution of marriage is associated with improved survival in women with ovarian cancer.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to examine the impact of marital status on survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS:Patients with a diagnosis of EOC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for the period 1988-2006 and divided into married and unmarried groups. Statistical analysis using Student's t-test, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression proportional hazards was performed. RESULTS: In 49,777 patients with EOC, 51.2% were married and 48.8% were unmarried. White women were likely to be married compared with African Americans (52.0% vs 32.4%, p < 0.05). Younger age (63.9% vs 43.4%, p < 0.001) and early stage disease (37.5% vs 33.8%, p < 0.001) were more prominent in married patients compared with unmarried patients. Staging lymphadenectomy was performed more frequently in married than unmarried patients (39.9% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001). Overall 5-year survival was 45.0% for married patients and 33.1% for unmarried patients, p < 0.001. Married patients had a better survival compared with unmarried patients within each racial subgroup: 44.5% vs 33.3% for White women (p < 0.001), 36.9% vs 24.9% for African Americans (p < 0.001), and 53.7% vs 42.7% for others (p < 0.001), respectively. In a model that controlled for age, race, histology, stage, grade, and surgical treatment, married patients had a significantly improved survival compared with unmarried patients (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.78-0.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this epidemiologic study, the social institution of marriage is associated with improved survival in women with ovarian cancer.
Authors: Hiroko Machida; Sarah E Eckhardt; Antonio V Castaneda; Erin A Blake; Huyen Q Pham; Lynda D Roman; Koji Matsuo Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald; Elizabeth M Poole; Anil K Sood; Olivia I Okereke; Ichiro Kawachi; Laura D Kubzansky; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2019 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Ayal A Aizer; Ming-Hui Chen; Ellen P McCarthy; Mallika L Mendu; Sophia Koo; Tyler J Wilhite; Powell L Graham; Toni K Choueiri; Karen E Hoffman; Neil E Martin; Jim C Hu; Paul L Nguyen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lauren C Peres; Sweta Sinha; Mary K Townsend; Brooke L Fridley; Beth Y Karlan; Susan K Lutgendorf; Eileen Shinn; Anil K Sood; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Jay G Hull; Michelle Y Martin; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Anna T Prescott; Tor Tosteson; Zhongze Li; Imatullah Akyar; Dheeraj Raju; Marie A Bakitas Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 4.452