Literature DB >> 21918947

Robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle: a preclinical investigation and case report.

Niyant V Patel1, John C Pedersen.   

Abstract

In an attempt to decrease donor-site morbidity for rectus abdominis muscle harvest during free tissue transfer, we developed a technique of minimally invasive harvest. The da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) was used in two cadavers for dissection and harvest of four rectus abdominis muscles. After the cadaver dissections were performed, the technique was used in a 30-year-old woman to harvest the left rectus abdominis muscle for free tissue transfer to a lower extremity defect. Four cadaver dissections for harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle using the da Vinci Surgical System were performed. In the cadavers and actual case, three ports (11 mm, 11 mm, and 15 mm) were used to access the abdominal cavity and perform the dissection. An additional 3 cm incision was used to remove the muscle from the abdominal cavity. The patient has not developed any surgical-site morbidity, including bulge or hernia in the 6 months postprocedure. Minimally invasive harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle is possible with the assistance of the da Vinci Surgical System. Potential benefits may include decreased surgical-site morbidity. Also, this may provide an approach to minimally invasive transperitoneal reconstruction. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21918947     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1287674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  9 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted microsurgery for an elective microsurgical practice.

Authors:  Ahmet Gudeloglu; Jamin V Brahmbhatt; Sijo J Parekattil
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle: principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  Amir E Ibrahim; Karim A Sarhane; John C Pederson; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Robotic-assisted microvascular surgery: skill acquisition in a rat model.

Authors:  Nicholas S Clarke; Johnathan Price; Travis Boyd; Stefano Salizzoni; Kenton J Zehr; Alejandro Nieponice; Pietro Bajona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-10

4.  A Systematic Review of the Role of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-From Inception to the Future.

Authors:  Thomas D Dobbs; Olivia Cundy; Harsh Samarendra; Khurram Khan; Iain Stuart Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-11-15

Review 5.  Robotic (super) microsurgery: Feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions.

Authors:  Tom J M van Mulken; Rutger M Schols; Shan S Qiu; Kaj Brouwers; Lisette T Hoekstra; Darren I Booi; Raimondo Cau; Ferry Schoenmakers; Andrea M J Scharmga; Rene R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Does plastic surgery need a rewiring? A survey and systematic review on robotic-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Christian Jimenez; Eloise Stanton; Cynthia Sung; Alex K Wong
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology: Recent advances.

Authors:  Ajay Puri
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-05

8.  A novel method of minimally invasive rectus abdominis muscle flap harvest: Laparoscopic surgeons take note.

Authors:  Tabish Aijaz; Dhruv Singhal; Sanda A Tan; Atif Iqbal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Current Limitations of Surgical Robotics in Reconstructive Plastic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Youri P A Tan; Philippe Liverneaux; Jason K F Wong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.