Literature DB >> 21918932

Ten-year trends in the financing of family medicine training programs: considerations for planning and policy.

Sarah Lesko1, Wes Fitch, Judith Pauwels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The recent Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes physician training provisions to address the US primary care workforce shortage and maldistribution. Policymakers require current graduate medical education (GME) residency finance data to design and implement programs that increase primary care physicians. The University of Washington Family Medicine Network residencies have collaborated for 10 years in collecting and comparing data regarding the revenues and expenses of their training programs. Based on biennial survey results from 2000 to 2010, this study examines changes in the finances of residency training over a decade using a standardized methodology.
METHODS: Data were systematically collected by standardized questionnaire, evaluated for quality and verified, and then analyzed.
RESULTS: The per-resident expense of residency education for these programs increased an average of 63%, and overall residency revenues increased 75%. GME funding per resident increased 47% but decreased as proportionate contribution to overall program revenue.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean cost per resident remained relatively stable over the 10-year period, with a 3.1% overall increase to $27,260 per resident per year. Programs that successfully obtained federally qualified health center (FQHC) status, increased their residency graduate medical education (GME) slots or received other new significant funding, such as state grants, were the most financially stable. Policy solutions would stabilize both federal GME and state Medicaid GME funding and increase reimbursement of primary care practice to maintain the viability of primary care training programs. Conclusions: The mean cost per resident remained relatively stable over the 10-year period, with a 3.1% overall increase to $27,260 per resident per year. Programs that successfully obtained federally qualified health center (FQHC) status, increased their residency graduate medical education (GME) slots or received other new significant funding, such as state grants, were the most financially stable. Policy solutions would stabilize both federal GME and state Medicaid GME funding and increase reimbursement of primary care practice to maintain the viability of primary care training programs.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21918932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  2 in total

1.  Financing Residency Training Redesign.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Elaine Waller; Larry A Green; Steven Crane; Roger D Garvin; Perry A Pugno; Stanley M Kozakowski; Alan B Douglass; Samuel Jones; M Patrice Eiff
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  Primary care in Asia: a call for compulsory vocational training.

Authors:  Tak Kwong Chan; Cassandra Yuen-Yan Lee; Shing Kin Yau; George Lim Tipoe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.