Literature DB >> 21918583

Percentile-based Empirical Distribution Function Estimates for Performance Evaluation of Healthcare Providers.

Susan M Paddock1, Thomas A Louis.   

Abstract

Hierarchical models are widely-used to characterize the performance of individual healthcare providers. However, little attention has been devoted to system-wide performance evaluations, the goals of which include identifying extreme (e.g., top 10%) provider performance and developing statistical benchmarks to define high-quality care. Obtaining optimal estimates of these quantities requires estimating the empirical distribution function (EDF) of provider-specific parameters that generate the dataset under consideration. However, the difficulty of obtaining uncertainty bounds for a square-error loss minimizing EDF estimate has hindered its use in system-wide performance evaluations. We therefore develop and study a percentile-based EDF estimate for univariate provider-specific parameters. We compute order statistics of samples drawn from the posterior distribution of provider-specific parameters to obtain relevant uncertainty assessments of an EDF estimate and its features, such as thresholds and percentiles. We apply our method to data from the Medicare End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Program, a health insurance program for people with irreversible kidney failure. We highlight the risk of misclassifying providers as exceptionally good or poor performers when uncertainty in statistical benchmark estimates is ignored. Given the high stakes of performance evaluations, statistical benchmarks should be accompanied by precision estimates.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21918583      PMCID: PMC3171002          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00760.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  11 in total

1.  Triple-goal estimates for disease mapping.

Authors:  W Shen; T A Louis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Impact of case volume on hospital performance assessment.

Authors:  Sean M O'Brien; Elizabeth R Delong; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-06-23

3.  Flexible distributions for triple-goal estimates in two-stage hierarchical models.

Authors:  Susan M Paddock; Greg Ridgeway; Rongheng Lin; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for independent and clustered data.

Authors:  Brian J Reich; Howard D Bondell; Huixia J Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling.

Authors:  C L Christiansen; C N Morris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; J J Allison; O D Williams; S D Person; M T Weaver; N W Weissman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Pay for performance in commercial HMOs.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Bruce E Landon; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Richard G Frank; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Performance measures, vaccinations, and pneumonia rates among high-risk patients in Veterans Administration health care.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Steven M Wright; Jonathan B Perlin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Flexible random-effects models using Bayesian semi-parametric models: applications to institutional comparisons.

Authors:  D I Ohlssen; L D Sharples; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  5 in total

1.  Statistical benchmarks for health care provider performance assessment: a comparison of standard approaches to a hierarchical Bayesian histogram-based method.

Authors:  Susan M Paddock
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Misclassification Risk of Tier-Based Physician Quality Performance Systems.

Authors:  John L Adams; Susan M Paddock
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Ensemble of trees approaches to risk adjustment for evaluating a hospital's performance.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Mikhail Traskin; Scott A Lorch; Edward I George; Dylan Small
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-04-29

4.  Making the cut: improved ranking and selection for large-scale inference.

Authors:  Nicholas C Henderson; Michael A Newton
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 4.488

5.  Separating variability in healthcare practice patterns from random error.

Authors:  Laine E Thomas; Phillip J Schulte
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.021

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.