Literature DB >> 21918523

Age dependency of peripheral and central systolic blood pressures: cross-sectional and longitudinal observations in a Chinese population.

Yan Li1, Jan A Staessen, Chang-Sheng Sheng, Qi-Fang Huang, Michael O'Rourke, Ji-Guang Wang.   

Abstract

Few studies have described the age-related changes in both peripheral and central systolic blood pressures (SBPs) in populations. We addressed this issue in 1066 women and 978 men, all untreated (mean age, 45.1 years; 27.2% hypertensive) and randomly selected from a Chinese population, of whom 369 and 330 underwent a repeat examination after 3.6 years (median). In cross-sectional analyses, central SBP increased more with age than peripheral SBP in women below age 50 (1.21 vs. 1.01 mm Hg per year; P<0.001) and in men below age 60 (0.73 vs. 0.48 mm Hg per year; P<0.001), whereas in older women (0.64 vs. 0.58 mm Hg per year; P=0.27) and older men (0.45 vs. 0.44 mm Hg per year; P=0.79), the slopes of central and peripheral SBPs on age were similar. Compared with men, women had steeper (P<0.001) age-related increases in peripheral and central SBPs. Systolic augmentation pressure increased with age, but this increase was substantially smaller (P<0.0001) for peripheral than central augmentation (women, 0.086 vs. 0.45 mm Hg per year; men, 0.083 vs. 0.39 mm Hg per year). In multivariable-adjusted regression, age contributed ≥89.7% of the explained variance in peripheral and central SBPs. In longitudinal analyses, the annual percentage increases from baseline to follow-up in peripheral and central SBP were similar (P≥0.76) in both women (2.14% vs. 2.16 % per year) and men (1.33% vs. 1.34 % per year; P-values for sex difference ≤0.044). In conclusion, in younger subjects assessed cross-sectionally, the age-related increase was larger for central than peripheral SBP, whereas the corresponding cross-sectional estimates in older subjects and the longitudinal estimates in all subjects showed similar age-related increases in central and peripheral SBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21918523     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2011.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  10 in total

1.  Hypertension. Age-specificity of blood-pressure-associated complications.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  The effect of intermittent intraabdominal pressure elevations and low cardiac output on the femoral to carotid arterial blood pressure difference in piglets.

Authors:  Devrim Aksakal; Thomas Hückstädt; Steffen Richter; Daniela Klitscher; Tobias Wowra; Felix Schier; Lucas M Wessel; Rainer Kubiak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prospective risk factors for increased central augmentation index in men and women.

Authors:  Prithvi Shiva Kumar; Josefina Medina-Lezama; Oscar Morey-Vargas; Payman Zamani; Juan F Bolaños-Salazar; Diana A Chirinos; Philip Haines; Zubair A Khan; Johanna C Coacalla-Guerra; Maria E Davalos-Robles; Gladys R Llerena-Dongo; Mardelangel Zapata-Ponze; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of arterial stiffening with age in European and chinese populations.

Authors:  Wiktoria Wojciechowska; Yan Li; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Jan A Staessen; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Electrocardiogram derived QRS duration associations with elevated central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) in a rural Australian population.

Authors:  Yvonne Yin Leng Lee; Paul Reidler; Herbert Jelinek; Yung Seng Lee; Yuling Zhou; Brett D Hambly; Joel McCabe; Slade Matthews; Honghong Ke; Hassan Assareh; Craig S McLachlan
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2016-02-16

6.  Combined exercise training improves blood pressure and antioxidant capacity in elderly individuals with hypertension.

Authors:  Ratree Ruangthai; Jatuporn Phoemsapthawee
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.103

7.  The Oscillometric Pulse Wave Analysis Is Useful in Evaluating the Arterial Stiffness of Obese Children with Relevant Cardiometabolic Risks.

Authors:  Monica Simina Mihuta; Corina Paul; Andreea Borlea; Cristina Mihaela Cepeha; Iulian Puiu Velea; Ioana Mozos; Dana Stoian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Central hypertension is a non-negligible cardiovascular risk factor.

Authors:  Yi-Bang Cheng; Yan Li; Hao-Min Cheng; Saulat Siddique; Minh Van Huynh; Apichard Sukonthasarn; Chen-Huan Chen; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.885

9.  Outcome-driven thresholds for ambulatory pulse pressure in 9938 participants recruited from 11 populations.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Gu; Lutgarde Thijs; Yan Li; Kei Asayama; José Boggia; Tine W Hansen; Yan-Ping Liu; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Jørgen Jeppesen; Eamon Dolan; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Valérie Tikhonoff; Sofia Malyutina; Edoardo Casiglia; Yuri Nikitin; Lars Lind; Edgardo Sandoya; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Yutaka Imai; Luis J Mena; Jiguang Wang; Eoin O'Brien; Peter Verhamme; Jan Filipovsky; Gladys E Maestre; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Associations of Left Ventricular Structure and Function With Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Analysis of the TOPCAT Trial.

Authors:  Fang-Fei Wei; Ruicong Xue; Lutgarde Thijs; Weihao Liang; Marvin Owusu-Agyeman; Xin He; Jan A Staessen; Yugang Dong; Chen Liu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.