OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of Web-based resident practice profiles (RPPs) as a means of tracking the clinical experiences of residents to ensure an adequate educational experience. DESIGN: Quantitative analysis of recorded patient encounters with residents. SETTING: The Department of Family and Community Medicine at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven residents enrolled in the department's training program between July 1, 2006, and June 30, 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical experiences of residents with respect to patient demographic information, procedures performed, and diagnoses. Resident data were stratified by age, sex, training status, and source of medical degree, and RPPs were compared with patient profiles of physicians at the study site, at the university, and in provincial practices. RESULTS: A total of 9108 patient visits were recorded by the 27 residents during the academic year. Patient visit characteristics were very similar across all the resident variables except with respect to sex. The top 8 diagnoses encountered by residents were very similar to those of the comparison groups; anxiety or neurosis was the most common problem. Injections and Papanicolaou smears were the most common procedures, with 17.9 and 11.6 procedures, respectively, performed on average per resident during the study period. CONCLUSION: The RPP is an excellent Web-based tool to capture the clinical experience of postgraduate trainees. The practice profiles of the resident group were very similar to those of physicians in the study site, the university, and the province, demonstrating that common diagnoses made in practice correlate well with the clinical experience in residency.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of Web-based resident practice profiles (RPPs) as a means of tracking the clinical experiences of residents to ensure an adequate educational experience. DESIGN: Quantitative analysis of recorded patient encounters with residents. SETTING: The Department of Family and Community Medicine at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven residents enrolled in the department's training program between July 1, 2006, and June 30, 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical experiences of residents with respect to patient demographic information, procedures performed, and diagnoses. Resident data were stratified by age, sex, training status, and source of medical degree, and RPPs were compared with patient profiles of physicians at the study site, at the university, and in provincial practices. RESULTS: A total of 9108 patient visits were recorded by the 27 residents during the academic year. Patient visit characteristics were very similar across all the resident variables except with respect to sex. The top 8 diagnoses encountered by residents were very similar to those of the comparison groups; anxiety or neurosis was the most common problem. Injections and Papanicolaou smears were the most common procedures, with 17.9 and 11.6 procedures, respectively, performed on average per resident during the study period. CONCLUSION: The RPP is an excellent Web-based tool to capture the clinical experience of postgraduate trainees. The practice profiles of the resident group were very similar to those of physicians in the study site, the university, and the province, demonstrating that common diagnoses made in practice correlate well with the clinical experience in residency.
Authors: Frederick J Meyers; Steven E Weinberger; John P Fitzgibbons; Jeffrey Glassroth; F Daniel Duffy; Charles P Clayton Journal: Acad Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 6.893