Literature DB >> 21917655

Impact of the permanent ventricular pacing site on left ventricular function in children: a retrospective multicentre survey.

Irene E van Geldorp1, Tammo Delhaas, Roman A Gebauer, Patrick Frias, Maren Tomaske, Mark K Friedberg, Svjetlana Tisma-Dupanovic, Jan Elders, Andreas Früh, Fulvio Gabbarini, Petr Kubus, Viera Illikova, Sabrina Tsao, Andreas Christian Blank, Anita Hiippala, Thierry Sluysmans, Peter Karpawich, Sally-Ann Clur, Xavier Ganame, Kathryn K Collins, Gisela Dann, Jean-Benoît Thambo, Conceição Trigo, Bert Nagel, John Papagiannis, Annette Rackowitz, Jan Marek, Jan-Hendrik Nürnberg, Ward Y Vanagt, Frits W Prinzen, Jan Janousek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with deleterious effects on cardiac function.
OBJECTIVE: In an observational multicentre study in children with isolated atrioventricular (AV) block receiving chronic ventricular pacing, the importance of the ventricular pacing site on left ventricular (LV) function was investigated.
METHODS: Demographics, maternal autoantibody status and echocardiographic measurements on LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and volumes at age <18 years were retrospectively collected from patients undergoing chronic ventricular pacing (>1 year) for isolated AV block. LV fractional shortening (LVFS) and, if possible LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated. Linear regression analyses were adjusted for patient characteristics.
RESULTS: From 27 centres, 297 children were included, in whom pacing was applied at the RV epicardium (RVepi, n = 147), RV endocardium (RVendo, n = 113) or LV epicardium (LVepi, n = 37). LVFS was significantly affected by pacing site (p = 0.001), and not by maternal autoantibody status (p = 0.266). LVFS in LVepi (39 ± 5%) was significantly higher than in RVendo (33 ± 7%, p < 0.001) and RVepi (35 ± 8%, p = 0.001; no significant difference between RV-paced groups, p = 0.275). Subnormal LVFS (LVFS < 28%) was seen in 16/113 (14%) RVendo-paced and 21/147 (14%) RVepi-paced children, while LVFS was normal (LVFS ≥ 28%) in all LVepi-paced children (p = 0.049). These results are supported by the findings for LVEF (n = 122): LVEF was <50% in 17/69 (25%) RVendo- and in 10/35 (29%) RVepi-paced patients, while LVEF was ≥ 50% in 17/18 (94%) LVepi-paced patients.
CONCLUSION: In children with isolated AV block, permanent ventricular pacing site is an important determinant of LV function, with LVFS being significantly higher with LV pacing than with RV pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21917655     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: pathophysiological insights through matrix metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Fozia Z Ahmed; Rajdeep S Khattar; Amir M Zaidi; Ludwig Neyses; Delvac Oceandy; Mamas Mamas
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Device therapy in children with and without congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jan Janoušek
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-29

3.  Is left ventricular superior to right ventricular pacing in children with congenital or postoperative complete heart block?

Authors:  Ch Bharat Siddharth; Jay Relan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28

Review 4.  Current Concepts of Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Authors:  Min-Soo Ahn
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2013-03-31

5.  Single chamber permanent epicardial pacing for children with congenital heart disease after surgical repair.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Yiwei Liu; Chengwei Zou; Hao Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.