Literature DB >> 21917306

An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Dennis S Chi1, Fernanda Musa, Fanny Dao, Oliver Zivanovic, Yukio Sonoda, Mario M Leitao, Douglas A Levine, Ginger J Gardner, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Richard R Barakat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The recent EORTC-NCIC randomized trial comparing primary debulking surgery (PDS) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) reported a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12 months and overall survival (OS) of 30 months for both arms. Due to the equivalent survival and decreased morbidity with NACT, many now consider it the preferred approach. We analyzed the outcomes of patients treated with PDS at our institution during the same time period in which the EORTC-NCIC trial was conducted, using identical inclusion criteria.
METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing primary treatment for advanced EOC at our institution from 9/98-12/06. Study inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical to those of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Standard statistical tests were used.
RESULTS: Of 316 eligible patients, 285 (90%) underwent PDS and 31 (10%) received NACT due to extra-abdominal disease, medical comorbidities, and/or advanced age (>85 years). Of the 285 patients who underwent PDS, most had carcinoma of ovarian origin (248, 87%); stage IIIC disease (249, 87%); grade 3 tumors (237, 83%); and serous histology (249, 87%). Optimal cytoreduction (≤1 cm residual) was achieved in 203 patients (71%). Postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy was given to 281 of 285 patients (99%). The median PFS and OS were 17 and 50 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION: PDS should continue to be the preferred initial management for patients with bulky stages IIIC-IV ovarian carcinoma. NACT should be reserved for those who cannot tolerate PDS and/or for whom optimal cytoreduction is not feasible.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21917306     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  65 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: latest results and place in therapy.

Authors:  Seiya Sato; Hiroaki Itamochi
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; Austin Miller; Bunja Rungruang; Scott D Richard; Noah Rodriguez; Michael A Bookman; Chad A Hamilton; Thomas C Krivak; G Larry Maxwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Emerging concerns when evidence-based medicine is translated into real life: the case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Antonio González-Martín; Luis Chiva
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Latest research and treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert L Coleman; Bradley J Monk; Anil K Sood; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  The optimal time for surgery in women with serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Stewart; Alicia A Tone; Haiyan Jiang; Marcus Q Bernardini; Sarah Ferguson; Stephane Laframboise; K Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen; Taymaa May
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Comparative effectiveness of upfront treatment strategies in elderly women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Jennifer Tsui; Sherry A Glied; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Surgical readmission and survival in women with ovarian cancer: Are short-term quality metrics incentivizing decreased long-term survival?

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Emma C Rossi; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Anna E Austin; Ryan P Hickson; Matthew S Dixon; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Less guessing, more evidence in identifying patients least fit for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: A triage algorithm to individualize surgical management.

Authors:  Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Amanika Kumar; Amy L Weaver; Carrie L Langstraat; William A Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Advanced ovarian cancer: what should be the standard of care?

Authors:  Barbara A Goff
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.