Literature DB >> 21916532

The impact of blood glucose monitoring on depression and distress in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.

L Fisher1, W Polonsky, C G Parkin, Z Jelsovsky, L Amstutz, R S Wagner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether a structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) protocol reduces depressive symptoms and diabetes distress. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 12-month, cluster-randomised, clinical trial compared patients who received a collaborative, structured SMBG, physician/patient intervention with an active control. Studied were 483 insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients (experimental = 256, control = 227) (≥ 7.5% HbA1c) from 34 primary care practices (experimental = 21, control = 13). Experimental patients used a paper tool to record a 7-point SMBG profile on each of three consecutive days prior to their quarterly physician visit. Patients and physicians interpreted SMBG results to make medication and lifestyle changes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NIH Trial Registry Number: NCT00674986. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire: PHQ-8), diabetes-related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale: DDS). HbA1c and SMBG frequency were assessed quarterly; data were analysed using Linear Mixed Models (LMM) for intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses.
RESULTS: ITT analyses showed significant improvement in depression and disease-related distress among experimental and control patients from baseline to 12 months (p < 0.01 in both cases) with no between-group differences. Experimental patients displayed significantly greater reductions in distress related to regimen adherence than controls. Also, experimental patients with elevated diabetes distress or depressive symptoms at baseline showed significantly greater reductions in distress and depressive symptoms than control patients at 12 months. The greater improvement in mood in the experimental than control group was independent of improvements in glycaemic control and changes in SMBG frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: Using well standardised measures, collaborative, structured SMBG leads to reductions, not increases, in depressive symptoms and diabetes distress over time, for the large number of moderately depressed or distressed type 2 patients in poor glycaemic control. Changes in affective status are independent of improvements in glycaemic control and changes in SMBG frequency for these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21916532     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2011.619176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  15 in total

Review 1.  Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Boon How Chew; Rimke C Vos; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Rob Jpm Scholten; Guy Ehm Rutten
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-27

2.  Impact on Diabetes Self-Management and Glycemic Control of a New Color-Based SMBG Meter.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Gerd Klausmann; Bettina Gutschek; Rosa Maria Garcia-Verdugo; Michael Hummel
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-26

3.  The Impact of Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Combined With Intensive Education on HbA1c Levels, Hospitalizations, and Quality-of-Life Parameters in Insulin-Treated Patients With Diabetes at Primary Care in Serbia: The Multicenter SPA-EDU Study.

Authors:  Nebojša M Lalić; Katarina Lalić; Aleksandra Jotić; Dejan Stanojević; Dragana Živojinović; Andrija Janićijević; Christopher Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-25

4.  Utilization of blood glucose data in patient education.

Authors:  Yaa Kumah-Crystal; Shelagh Mulvaney
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  The Burden of Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose on Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life and Locus of Control in Patients with Noninsulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: The PRISMA Study.

Authors:  Giuseppina T Russo; Marina Scavini; Elena Acmet; Erminio Bonizzoni; Emanuele Bosi; Francesco Giorgino; Antonio Tiengo; Domenico Cucinotta
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients: right answer, but wrong question: self-monitoring of blood glucose can be clinically valuable for noninsulin users.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients: it is time to face the evidence.

Authors:  Uriëll L Malanda; Sandra D Bot; G Nijpels
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Higher levels of psychological distress are associated with a higher risk of incident diabetes during 18 year follow-up: results from the British household panel survey.

Authors:  Paula M C Mommersteeg; Raphael Herr; Wobbe P Zijlstra; Sven Schneider; François Pouwer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Intensive structured self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycemic control in noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: the PRISMA randomized trial.

Authors:  Emanuele Bosi; Marina Scavini; Antonio Ceriello; Domenico Cucinotta; Antonio Tiengo; Raffaele Marino; Erminio Bonizzoni; Francesco Giorgino
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Current concepts in blood glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Kranti Shreesh Khadilkar; Tushar Bandgar; Vyankatesh Shivane; Anurag Lila; Nalini Shah
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.