Literature DB >> 21916438

Resistance of galactoside-terminated alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers to marine fouling organisms.

Thomas Ederth1, Tobias Ekblad, Michala E Pettitt, Sheelagh L Conlan, Chun-Xia Du, Maureen E Callow, James A Callow, Robert Mutton, Anthony S Clare, Fraddry D'Souza, Glen Donnelly, Anouk Bruin, Peter R Willemsen, Xueju J Su, Su Wang, Qi Zhao, Markus Hederos, Peter Konradsson, Bo Liedberg.   

Abstract

Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of galactoside-terminated alkanethiols have protein-resistance properties which can be tuned via the degree of methylation [Langmuir 2005, 21, 2971-2980]. Specifically, a partially methylated compound was more resistant to nonspecific protein adsorption than the hydroxylated or fully methylated counterparts. We investigate whether this also holds true for resistance to the attachment and adhesion of a range of marine species, in order to clarify to what extent resistance to protein adsorption correlates with the more complex adhesion of fouling organisms. The partially methylated galactoside-terminated SAM was further compared to a mixed monolayer of ω-substituted methyl- and hydroxyl-terminated alkanethiols with wetting properties and surface ratio of hydroxyl to methyl groups matching that of the galactoside. The settlement (initial attachment) and adhesion strength of four model marine fouling organisms were investigated, representing both micro- and macrofoulers; two bacteria (Cobetia marina and Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus), barnacle cypris larvae (Balanus amphitrite), and algal zoospores (Ulva linza). The minimum in protein adsorption onto the partially methylated galactoside surface was partly reproduced in the marine fouling assays, providing some support for a relationship between protein resistance and adhesion of marine fouling organisms. The mixed alkanethiol SAM, which was matched in wettability to the partially methylated galactoside SAM, consistently showed higher settlement (initial attachment) of test organisms than the galactoside, implying that both wettability and surface chemistry are insufficient to explain differences in fouling resistance. We suggest that differences in the structure of interfacial water may explain the variation in adhesion to these SAMs.
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21916438     DOI: 10.1021/am200726a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  3 in total

1.  Identifying adhesive components in a model tunicate.

Authors:  Fan Zeng; Julia Wunderer; Willi Salvenmoser; Thomas Ederth; Ute Rothbächer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Antifouling glycocalyx-mimetic peptoids.

Authors:  Hyun Ok Ham; Sung Hyun Park; Josh W Kurutz; Igal G Szleifer; Phillip B Messersmith
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Modulation of Protein Fouling and Interfacial Properties at Carbon Surfaces via Immobilization of Glycans Using Aryldiazonium Chemistry.

Authors:  Federico Zen; M Daniela Angione; James A Behan; Ronan J Cullen; Thomas Duff; Joana M Vasconcelos; Eoin M Scanlan; Paula E Colavita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.