Literature DB >> 21915714

Relating to participants: how close do biobanks and donors really want to be?

Mairi Levitt1.   

Abstract

Modern biobanks typically rely on the public to freely donate genetic data, undergo physical measurements and tests, allow access to medical records and give other personal information by questionnaire or interview. Given the demands on participants it is not surprising that there has been extensive public consultation even before biobanks in the UK and elsewhere began to recruit. This paper considers the different ways in which biobanks have attempted to engage and appeal to their publics and the reaction of potential and actual donors. Whilst those organising biobanks presumably want to be as close to their publics as they need to be in order to successfully recruit and sustain participation in sufficient numbers, the closer the relationship the more obligations and expectations there are on both sides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21915714     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-011-0193-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  3 in total

1.  Community engagement in genetic research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE project.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Jennifer Marshall; Claude Laberge
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

2.  Children as means and ends in large-scale medical research.

Authors:  Garrath Williams
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Encounters with medical professionals: a crisis of trust or matter of respect?

Authors:  Nina Hallowell
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-07-30
  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Power to the people: a wiki-governance model for biobanks.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Yann Joly; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?

Authors:  Kristin Solum Steinsbekk; Bjørn Kåre Myskja; Berge Solberg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Questioning the rhetoric of a 'willing population' in Finnish biobanking.

Authors:  Karoliina Snell; Heta Tarkkala
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2019-05-27

4.  The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks: A scoping review.

Authors:  Lidia Luna Puerta; Will Kendall; Bethan Davies; Sophie Day; Helen Ward
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.318

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.