Literature DB >> 21915670

Form of the compensatory stepping response to repeated laterally directed postural disturbances.

Christopher P Hurt1, Noah J Rosenblatt, Mark D Grabiner.   

Abstract

A compensatory stepping response (CSR) is a common strategy to restore dynamic stability in response to a postural disturbance. Currently, few studies have investigated the CSR to laterally directed disturbances delivered to subjects during quiet standing. The purpose of this study was to characterize the CSR of younger adults following exposure to a series of similar laterally directed disturbances for which no instructions were given with regard to the recovery response. We hypothesized that in the absence of externally applied constraints to the recovery response, subjects would be equally as likely to perform a crossover step as a sidestep sequence (SSS). We further hypothesized that there would be an asymmetry in arm abduction that would be dependent on the disturbance direction. Finally, we were interested in characterizing the effect of practice on the CSR to repeated disturbances. Ten younger adults were exposed to thirty laterally directed platform disturbances that forced a stepping response. Subjects responded by primarily utilizing a SSS that differs from previously reported results. Further, five of the ten subjects utilized a different recovery response that was dependent on the direction of the disturbance (i.e., left or right). Greater arm abduction was characterized for the arm in the direction of the external disturbance in comparison with the contralateral arm. Lastly, subjects modified their recovery response to this task within 12 disturbances. Taken together, these results suggest that recovery responses to laterally directed disturbances can be quickly modified but can be quite variable between and within subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21915670     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2854-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  Age-related differences in laterally directed compensatory stepping behavior.

Authors:  B E Maki; M A Edmondstone; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees.

Authors:  At L Hof; Renske M van Bockel; Tanneke Schoppen; Klaas Postema
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Practicing recovery from a simulated trip improves recovery kinematics after an actual trip.

Authors:  Kathleen A Bieryla; Michael L Madigan; Maury A Nussbaum
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  The role of arm movement in early trip recovery in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Paulien E Roos; M Polly McGuigan; David G Kerwin; Grant Trewartha
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Armed against falls: the contribution of arm movements to balance recovery after tripping.

Authors:  Mirjam Pijnappels; Idsart Kingma; Daphne Wezenberg; Guus Reurink; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of lateral destabilization on compensatory stepping responses.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy; S D Perry
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; B E Maki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-01-30       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Age-dependent differences in lateral balance recovery through protective stepping.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Mille; Marjorie E Johnson; Katherine M Martinez; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Lateral balance factors predict future falls in community-living older adults.

Authors:  Marjorie Johnson Hilliard; Katherine M Martinez; Imke Janssen; Beatrice Edwards; Marie-Laure Mille; Yunhui Zhang; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  A perturbation-based balance training program for older adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; Amy L Peters; Barbara A Liu; Brian E Maki
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  5 in total

1.  Age-related differences in the maintenance of frontal plane dynamic stability while stepping to targets.

Authors:  Christopher P Hurt; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Perturbation-evoked lateral steps in older adults: Why take two steps when one will do?

Authors:  J Borrelli; R A Creath; D Pizac; H Hsiao; O P Sanders; M W Rogers
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Kinematic and behavioral analyses of protective stepping strategies and risk for falls among community living older adults.

Authors:  Woei-Nan Bair; Michelle G Prettyman; Brock A Beamer; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  The Motion of Body Center of Mass During Walking: A Review Oriented to Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Luigi Tesio; Viviana Rota
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Examining Different Motor Learning Paradigms for Improving Balance Recovery Abilities Among Older Adults, Random vs. Block Training-Study Protocol of a Randomized Non-inferiority Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hadas Nachmani; Inbal Paran; Moti Salti; Ilan Shelef; Itshak Melzer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.